Clement Chidekh vs Martin Damm Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chidekh vs Damm analysis and find out who is favored!
Clement Chidekh vs Martin Damm Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chidekh has won 52.83% of points on his second serve, while Damm has won 51.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chidekh, in recent form, has won 55.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Damm has won 45.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.53% and 25.55% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chidekh has saved 62.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Damm has saved 72.04% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chidekh has won 73.77% of matches played (W/L 45/ 16), with Damm winning 66.28% (W/L 57/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chidekh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 60/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Damm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 63/ 40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 41/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Chidekh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 30/ 10), where as Damm has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.38% of matches (W/L 32/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chidekh winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Chidekh winning 2 and Damm winning 1. The last match between Chidekh and Damm was at the M25 Sunderland, 28-01-2023, Semifinals, I.hard with Clement Chidekh getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chidekh and Damm have played a deciding set 1 times, with Chidekh winning 1 times and Damm 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Chidekh winning 0, and Damm 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chidekh has played against opponents with an average rank of 312.07 while Damm has played against players with an average rank of 255.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chidekh has won 79% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Damm has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chidekh has converted 44.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Damm has converted 38.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chidekh 1 - 0 Damm
8
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
293
Rank
293
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
204
Rank
204
High
20
Age
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
70% (110-48)
Career Total W/L
58% (134-98)
82% (27-6)
YTD W/L
62% (13-8)
$6,035
Career Prize Money
$107,985
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Clement Chidekh | Martin Damm |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 19 | 15 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 31 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 2:31:0 | 2:31:0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (74/105) | 61% (71/117) |
1st Serve Win% | 77% (57/74) | 69% (49/71) |
2nd Serve Win% | 55% (17/31) | 54% (25/46) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 17% (1/6) |
Return Points W% | 37% (43/117) | 30% (31/105) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Damm
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
71 of
117)
9
Aces
31
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
49 of
71)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
31 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
117)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Clement Chidekh | Martin Damm |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 82% (27/6) | 62% (13/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 71% (54/22) | 54% (26/22) |
Games Win/Loss | 57% (397/298) | 51% (264/254) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 82% (27/6) | 64% (7/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.26 | 1.15 |
Aces Total | 88 | 291 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.31 |
DFs Total | 69 | 79 |
Avg Match Time | 1:38:14 | 1:46:10 |
Avg Opp Rank | 310.55 | 309.95 |
1st Serve % | 62% (1350/2189) | 60% (996/1652) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (936/1350) | 79% (783/996) |
2nd Serve W% | 54% (449/839) | 50% (328/656) |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (124/275) | 38% (34/90) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (1007/2309) | 32% (508/1567) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 88% (14/2) | 63% (10/6) |
Futures W/L | 81% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 81% (26/32) | 60% (12/20) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 47% (9/19) |
Deciding Set W% | 91% (10/11) | 86% (6/7) |
1st set W, W | 96% (23/22) | 91% (11/10) |
1st set W, L | 4% (23/1) | 9% (11/1) |
1st set L, W | 50% (10/5) | 20% (10/2) |
Clement Chidekh Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Maxime Janvier
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Antoine Escoffier
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
74%
(
23 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
23 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Arthur Fery
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
55
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Axel Garcian
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Robin Bertrand
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Henri Squire
Player
Clement Chidekh
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Yuta Shimizu
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Michael Agwi
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
23 of
28)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Nicola Kuhn
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Adrian Andreev
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
117)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
48 of
79)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
57 of
117)
119
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Martin Damm Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Martin Damm
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
13
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
87)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
13
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Damm
Player
Filip Misolic
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
13
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
21 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
15
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
45 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Martin Damm
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Damm
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
54%
(
51 of
94)
1st Serve %
76%
(
74 of
97)
7
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
49 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Martin Damm
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H |
view more