Prediction of Clay Thompson vs Nathaniel Lammons Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Thompson vs N. Lammons

Clay Thompson
USA
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
33
Age
32
6'6" (198 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
595
408
Best Rank
591
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$920
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Nathaniel Lammons
USA
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
33
Age
32
6'6" (198 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
595
408
Best Rank
591
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$920
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Thompson 1 - 0 Lammons
They have played 3 sets in total, with Clay Thompson winning 2 and Nathaniel Lammons winning 1. The last match between Clay Thompson and Nathaniel Lammons was at the USA F21, 29-06-2015, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Clay Thompson getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Thompson | 1 |
| Lammons | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) USA F21(06-29-15)
Clay Thompson
4
6
6
Nathaniel Lammons
6
3
3
C. Thompson vs N. Lammons H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $920 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.69% (90-66) | Career Total W/L | 53.42% (78-68) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Thompson vs N. Lammons Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Clay Thompson has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 65.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Clay Thompson, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 45.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 26.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Clay Thompson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nathaniel Lammons has saved 50.00% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Clay Thompson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nathaniel Lammons winning 0% (W/L 0/1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Clay Thompson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/8), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Nathaniel Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 50/33), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Clay Thompson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nathaniel Lammons has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Clay Thompson winning 1 times and Nathaniel Lammons being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Clay Thompson winning 2 and Nathaniel Lammons winning 1.
- The last match between Clay Thompson and Nathaniel Lammons was at the USA F21, 29-06-2015, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Clay Thompson getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Clay Thompson has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nathaniel Lammons has played against players with an average rank of 867.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Clay Thompson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Clay Thompson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nathaniel Lammons has converted 50.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Clay Thompson vs Nathaniel Lammons Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Thompson vs N. Lammons H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Thompson 0%, Lammons 65%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Thompson 0%, Lammons 45%.
Break Points Saved %: Thompson 0%, Lammons 50%.
C. Thompson Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
N. Lammons Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 5-7 7-5 1-2 ret. | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4 | ||

C. Thompson vs N. Lammons Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.69% (90/66) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.42% (78/68) |
| 57.10% (205/154) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.46% (188/151) |
| 52.96% (1833/1628) | Games Win/Loss | 52.85% (1681/1500) |
| 57.14% (72/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.24% (50/33) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.45% (10/12) |
| 63.64% (14/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.00% (18/22) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 638 | Aces Total | 463 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 384 | Total Double Faults | 233 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 536.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 397.07 |
| 59% (3523/5924) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3350/5549) |
| 73% (2567/3523) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (2359/3350) |
| 50% (1204/2401) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1061/2199) |
| 42% (202/481) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (162/401) |
| 36% (2114/5839) | Return Points Win % | 35% (1907/5473) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.94% (27/24) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (13/26) |
| 62.63% (62/37) | Futures W/L | 60.75% (65/42) |
| 57% (88/154) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (78/145) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 48% (25/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (24/46) |
| 45% (21/47) | Deciding Set Win % | 35% (16/46) |
| 86% (93/80) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (83/68) |
| 14% (93/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (83/15) |
| 14% (63/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (63/11) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sun, 30 Nov, 06:00 AM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 10:30 AM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 11:10 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 07:15 AM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 05:00 AM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 02:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

29 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

29 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Betting Tips & Picks November 28, 2025
Top Predictions Today
23:10
H2H 0-0
05:30
H2H 0-0
14:00
H2H 0-0
15:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Athens Challenger
Greece
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Temuco Challenger
Chile
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Gwalior
India
M15 Phan Thiet
Vietnam
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Bhopal
India
M25 Heraklion
Greece