search

Claudio Fortuna vs Ryan Nijboer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fortuna vs Nijboer analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Claudio Fortuna vs Ryan Nijboer Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fortuna has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nijboer has won 48.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fortuna, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nijboer has won 53.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Fortuna has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nijboer has saved 56.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Fortuna has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nijboer winning 62.64% (W/L 57/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Fortuna has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 59/ 46), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13).
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fortuna winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fortuna winning 0 and Nijboer winning 2. The last match between Fortuna and Nijboer was at the Israel F14 (Meitar), 18-10-2018, Quarterfinals, Hard with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory .
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Fortuna and Nijboer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fortuna winning 0 times and Nijboer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fortuna winning 0, and Nijboer 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fortuna has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nijboer has played against players with an average rank of 156.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fortuna has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nijboer has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Fortuna has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nijboer has converted 46.01% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Fortuna 0 - 1 Nijboer

Claudio Fortuna

3

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

3

Minor

Ret.

Rank

384

High

33

Age

Plays

0

Total

1

0

Hard

1

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

484

Rank

437

High

24

Age

R

Plays

Ryan Nijboer

3

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

3

Minor

0

Total

1

0

Hard

1

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W W L L L W L L L L

Form

L L W L L W L L W W

54% (255-219)

Career Total W/L

57% (214-164)

0% (0-0)

YTD W/L

55% (12-10)

$0

Career Prize Money

$5,735

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Fortuna VS Nijboer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Claudio Fortuna Ryan Nijboer
All H2H Matches 0 1
Sets Won 0 2
Games Won 6 12
Aces (Total) 3 0
DFs (Total) 3 2
Avg Match Time 1:28:0 1:28:0
1st Serve % 60% (28/47) 75% (50/67)
1st Serve Win% 68% (19/28) 70% (35/50)
2nd Serve Win% 47% (9/19) 65% (11/17)
BPs Won% (Total) 0% (0/8) 50% (3/6)
Return Points W% 31% (21/67) 40% (19/47)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 100% (1/1)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)
1st set L, W 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)

Fortuna VS Nijboer H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 6-2
cross
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Claudio Fortuna
75% ( 50 of 67)
1st Serve %
60% ( 28 of 47)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70% ( 35 of 50)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 19 of 28)
65% ( 11 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 9 of 19)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 8)
31% ( 21 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 19 of 47)
65
Total Points Won
49

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Claudio Fortuna Ryan Nijboer
YTD W/L 0% (0/0) 55% (12/10)
Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 57% (29/22)
Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 54% (263/222)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 73% (8/3)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 50% (4/4)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/3)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0 0.44
Aces Total 0 103
DFs per game 0 0.39
DFs Total 0 91
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1:50:58
Avg Opp Rank 0 207.32
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 58% (864/1496)
1st Serve W% 0% (0/0) 71% (612/864)
2nd Serve W% 0% (0/0) 50% (317/632)
BPs Won% Total 0% (0/0) 46% (81/178)
Return Pts W% 0% (0/0) 43% (665/1563)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 17% (1/5)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 69% (11/5)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 55% (12/22)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 29% (2/7)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 29% (2/7)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 77% (13/10)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 23% (13/3)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 22% (9/2)

Claudio Fortuna Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Vladimir Ivanov
Player
Claudio Fortuna
65% ( 33 of 51)
1st Serve %
43% ( 20 of 46)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
79% ( 26 of 33)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 12 of 20)
39% ( 7 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 9 of 26)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
35% ( 18 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 25 of 46)
58
Total Points Won
39
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Giovanni Rizzuti
Player
Claudio Fortuna
57% ( 41 of 72)
1st Serve %
46% ( 34 of 74)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
63% ( 26 of 41)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 24 of 34)
48% ( 15 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 16 of 40)
27% ( 3 of 11)
Break Points Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
43% ( 31 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 34 of 74)
75
Total Points Won
71
L
6-3 3-6 10-6 H2H
R1
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Claudio Fortuna
49% ( 37 of 76)
1st Serve %
60% ( 47 of 78)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
4
70% ( 26 of 37)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 27 of 47)
49% ( 19 of 39)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 14 of 31)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
41% ( 31 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 37 of 78)
82
Total Points Won
72
L
7-5 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Claudio Fortuna
57% ( 58 of 101)
1st Serve %
55% ( 53 of 97)
8
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
76% ( 44 of 58)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 37 of 53)
42% ( 18 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 22 of 44)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
39% ( 39 of 101)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 38 of 97)
100
Total Points Won
98
L
7-5 4-6 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Claudio Fortuna
Player
Mirko Martinez
53% ( 31 of 59)
1st Serve %
55% ( 32 of 58)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
81% ( 25 of 31)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 16 of 32)
57% ( 16 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 15 of 26)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
31% ( 18 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 27 of 58)
68
Total Points Won
49
W
7-5 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Claudio Fortuna
67% ( 34 of 51)
1st Serve %
54% ( 26 of 48)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
85% ( 29 of 34)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 19 of 26)
71% ( 12 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 12 of 22)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
20% ( 10 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 17 of 48)
58
Total Points Won
41
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Claudio Fortuna
73% ( 53 of 73)
1st Serve %
63% ( 44 of 70)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70% ( 37 of 53)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 33 of 44)
55% ( 11 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 13 of 26)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
34% ( 25 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 24 of 70)
72
Total Points Won
71
L
7-6(3) 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Claudio Fortuna
75% ( 50 of 67)
1st Serve %
60% ( 28 of 47)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70% ( 35 of 50)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 19 of 28)
65% ( 11 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 9 of 19)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 8)
31% ( 21 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 19 of 47)
65
Total Points Won
49
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Claudio Fortuna
Player
Francesco Ferrari
65% ( 34 of 52)
1st Serve %
62% ( 31 of 50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76% ( 26 of 34)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 22 of 31)
67% ( 12 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
27% ( 14 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 20 of 50)
58
Total Points Won
44
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Claudio Fortuna
Player
Guy Den Heijer
68% ( 30 of 44)
1st Serve %
61% ( 34 of 56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
77% ( 23 of 30)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 18 of 34)
71% ( 10 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
25% ( 11 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 28 of 56)
61
Total Points Won
39
W
6-3 6-1 H2H

Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R2
cross
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63% ( 46 of 73)
1st Serve %
61% ( 43 of 71)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
63% ( 29 of 46)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 22 of 43)
41% ( 11 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 15 of 28)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
45% ( 33 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 34 of 71)
74
Total Points Won
70
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
61% ( 20 of 33)
1st Serve %
64% ( 25 of 39)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
90% ( 18 of 20)
1st Serve Won
40% ( 10 of 25)
77% ( 10 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 4 of 14)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
15% ( 5 of 33)
Rtn Points Won
64% ( 25 of 39)
53
Total Points Won
19
W
6-0 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Ryan Nijboer
46% ( 53 of 116)
1st Serve %
65% ( 61 of 94)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
75% ( 40 of 53)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 43 of 61)
54% ( 34 of 63)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 16 of 33)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
11% ( 1 of 9)
36% ( 42 of 116)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 35 of 94)
109
Total Points Won
101
L
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71% ( 53 of 75)
1st Serve %
75% ( 57 of 76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62% ( 33 of 53)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 30 of 57)
45% ( 10 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
21% ( 4 of 19)
62% ( 8 of 13)
Break Points Won
50% ( 5 of 10)
43% ( 32 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 42 of 76)
85
Total Points Won
66
L
6-2 4-6 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Robert Strombachs
62% ( 33 of 53)
1st Serve %
50% ( 22 of 44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
70% ( 23 of 33)
1st Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
40% ( 8 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 7 of 22)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
42% ( 22 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
61% ( 27 of 44)
58
Total Points Won
39
W
6-3 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57% ( 43 of 75)
1st Serve %
65% ( 45 of 69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60% ( 26 of 43)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 28 of 45)
47% ( 15 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
45% ( 34 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 31 of 69)
72
Total Points Won
72
L
7-6(3) 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ryan Nijboer
78% ( 38 of 49)
1st Serve %
63% ( 36 of 57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
68% ( 26 of 38)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 18 of 36)
36% ( 4 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 6 of 21)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
39% ( 19 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 33 of 57)
63
Total Points Won
43
L
6-1 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Dali Blanch
57% ( 37 of 65)
1st Serve %
58% ( 41 of 71)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
76% ( 28 of 37)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 24 of 41)
50% ( 14 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 11 of 30)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
35% ( 23 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 36 of 71)
78
Total Points Won
58
W
3-6 6-1 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Hazem Naow
Player
Ryan Nijboer
72% ( 60 of 83)
1st Serve %
60% ( 61 of 102)
2
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
68% ( 41 of 60)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 45 of 61)
43% ( 10 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 16 of 41)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
45% ( 5 of 11)
39% ( 32 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 41 of 102)
92
Total Points Won
93
L
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) H2H
Q1
cross
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55% ( 58 of 106)
1st Serve %
50% ( 55 of 109)
5
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
4
81% ( 47 of 58)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 42 of 55)
52% ( 25 of 48)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 32 of 54)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
32% ( 34 of 106)
Rtn Points Won
32% ( 35 of 109)
107
Total Points Won
108
L
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) H2H

Fortuna Vs Nijboer Prediction H2H Images To Share

Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ryan Nijboer

M25 Hammamet

Nijboer vs Butvilas H2H Prediction , could play in The Final

Nijboer vs Furness H2H Prediction , could play in The Final

Nijboer vs Collignon H2H Prediction , could play in The Final

Nijboer vs Kopp H2H Prediction , could play in The Final

Nijboer vs Bax H2H Prediction , could play in The Final

Nijboer vs Gima H2H Prediction , could play in The Final

Juszczak vs Nijboer H2H Prediction , could play in The Semifinals

Dougaz vs Nijboer H2H Prediction , could play in The Semifinals

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions