Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Claudia Sofia Martinez Solis vs Elizabeth Jurna Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Solis vs Jurna analysis and find out who is favored!
Claudia Sofia Martinez Solis vs Elizabeth Jurna Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Solis 0 - 0 Jurna
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Solis has won 38.1% of points on their second serve, while Jurna has won 30.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Solis, in recent form, has won 65.13% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jurna has won 50.74%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.18% and 34.19% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Solis has saved 49.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jurna has saved 36.62% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Solis has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 18/ 24), with Jurna winning 31.82% (W/L 7/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Solis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 19/ 18), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16). Jurna has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 32% (W/L 19/ 40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Solis has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 15/ 15), where as Jurna has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 4/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Solis has played against opponents with an average rank of 180.64 while Jurna has played against players with an average rank of 349.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Solis has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jurna has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Solis has converted 49.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jurna has converted 40.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
45% (31-38)
Career Total W/L
33% (28-57)
40% (12-18)
YTD W/L
14% (2-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Claudia Sofia Martinez Solis vs Elizabeth Jurna For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Solis VS Jurna
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Claudia Sofia Martinez Solis | Elizabeth Jurna |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (12/18) | 14% (2/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (30/39) | 17% (5/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (313/354) | 31% (73/162) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) | 15% (2/11) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 18 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 89 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 146.27 | 392.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (673/981) | 54% (254/468) |
| 1st Serve W% | 53% (355/673) | 57% (145/254) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 39% (120/308) | 31% (66/214) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (70/139) | 40% (21/52) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (479/981) | 41% (209/513) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 17% (2/10) |
| Futures W/L | 43% (9/12) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (12/30) | 14% (2/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 12% (17/2) | 0% (12/0) |
Claudia Sofia Martinez Solis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 2-6 7-5 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Amy Zhu
Player
Claudia Sofia Martinez Solis
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Carina Syrtveit
Player
Claudia Sofia Martinez Solis
58%
(
81 of
140)
1st Serve %
69%
(
81 of
118)
1
Aces
0
19
Double Faults
4
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
32%
(
19 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
Break Points Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
56%
(
78 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
67 of
118)
129
Total Points Won
129
|
5-7 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Claudia Sofia Martinez Solis
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
50
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Claudia Sofia Martinez Solis
Player
Maria Gaia Meneguzzo
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
13
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-6(3) 14-12 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Elizabeth Jurna Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Elizabeth Jurna
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
13
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olga Helmi
Player
Elizabeth Jurna
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
43%
(
18 of
42)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
14
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Milovanovic
Player
Elizabeth Jurna
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
69)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
17
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Elizabeth Jurna
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
15
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Iveta Dapkute
Player
Elizabeth Jurna
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
87%
(
34 of
39)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Jurna
Player
Tilde Stromquist
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
52%
(
34 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Solis Vs Jurna Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Solis are available here and Jurna photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
