Claudia Hoste Ferrer vs Jasmijn Gimbrere Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W W L L L
Form
W L W L W W L W L LHead-to-head: Ferrer 1 - 1 Gimbrere
They have played 5 sets in total, with Ferrer winning 3 and Gimbrere winning 2. The last match between Ferrer and Gimbrere was at the W15 Manacor, 18-02-2025, First, Hard with Jasmijn Gimbrere getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-4.
W15 Manacor(18-02-2025)
4
6
6
2
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
8
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
1
3
Sets Won
2
24
Games Won
22
1
Aces (Total)
2
5
Total Double Faults
10
1:53:33
Average Match Time
1:53:33
73% (104/142)
1st Serve %
61% (87/142)
67% (70/104)
1st Serve Win %
62% (54/87)
45% (17/38)
2nd Serve Win %
53% (29/55)
50% (7/14)
Break Points Won % (Total)
43% (6/14)
42% (59/142)
Return Points Win %
39% (55/142)
50% (1/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (1/1)
50% (2/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
50% (2/1)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
50% (2/1)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Claudia Hoste Ferrer vs Jasmijn Gimbrere Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Claudia Hoste Ferrer 1 - 1 Jasmijn Gimbrere
- Recent Performance Analysis: In the past six months, Ferrer has exhibited an impressive second serve performance by winning 48.34% of points on this crucial shot. On the other hand, Gimbrere has maintained a commendable 45.57% success rate. This statistic holds a significant correlation with the accuracy of match predictions, further amplifying its importance.
- Return Game Proficiency: Recent return game statistics provide valuable insights into the players' abilities. Ferrer, displaying remarkable form, has won 48.39% of their opponents' second serve points, while Gimbrere has showcased an even higher proficiency at 58.28%. This trend is also reflected in their first serve return percentages, with Ferrer at 41.03% and Gimbrere at 41.3%. Remarkably, these statistics carry a high correlation with predicting the favored contender in this highly anticipated head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
- Assessing Performance Under Pressure: When it comes to handling critical moments, Ferrer has proven his mettle by saving 53.49% of breakpoints in recent matches. In comparison, Gimbrere has showcased a slightly higher ability to withstand pressure, saving 55.7% of breakpoints. This statistic serves as a valuable resource for in-game betting predictions.
- Overview of Performance: Examining the players' performance over the past year, Ferrer has won 38.71% of matches played, boasting a win/loss record of 12/19. In contrast, Gimbrere has achieved a more impressive win rate of 59.32% with a win/loss record of 35/24. These figures provide us with a comprehensive overview of the head-to-head prediction.
- Surface Advantage: Delving into the players' career surface statistics, it is evident that Ferrer excels on clay courts, winning 53% of matches (W/L 181/161). However, his performance on indoor hard courts leaves room for improvement, with a win rate of only 36% (W/L 4/7). In contrast, Gimbrere thrives on hard court surfaces, securing victories in 56% of matches (W/L 49/38). Nonetheless, his performance on grass courts drops significantly, with a win rate of 0% (W/L 0/2).
- Player Proficiency: Over the past year, Ferrer has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 10/14). Conversely, Gimbrere has primarily participated in higher-tier Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K, achieving a remarkable win rate of 57.69% (W/L 30/22). When comparing these statistics to predict the favorite, it is essential to consider the relative event level at which the players have been competing.
- Head-to-Head Battles: The two contenders have previously clashed once, resulting in Ferrer claiming victory on that sole occasion, while Gimbrere was unsuccessful. During their encounter, they competed in two sets, both of which Ferrer emerged triumphant. This match took place at the W15 Cairo tournament on the 23rd of July 2021, during the quarterfinals, on a clay court. Claudia Hoste Ferrer secured a convincing victory with a score of 6-2, 6-4.
- Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: The average match duration between these players in their previous encounters has been 1 hour, 34 minutes, and 0 seconds.
- Decisive Set Predictions: In their previous meetings, Ferrer and Gimbrere have entered into the deciding set phase zero times. Therefore, there are no statistical records to determine their success rates in such situations. However, this information is highly valuable for predicting the outcome if this match reaches that stage.
- Head-to-Head Pressure Situations: Throughout their matchups, Ferrer and Gimbrere have not faced each other in any tiebreaks, resulting in zero victories for either player in this specific circumstance.
- Opponent Quality Analysis: Over the past 12 months, Ferrer has confronted opponents with an average ranking of 406.71, indicating a relatively competitive field. In comparison, Gimbrere has encountered players with an average ranking of 430.39, signifying a similar challenging level. These statistics shed light on the level of competition each player has faced.
- Decisive Set Performance Against All Players: For those interested in live predictions and betting opportunities, it is worth noting that if this match progresses to a decisive set, Ferrer has won 29% of such sets over the past year. On the other hand, Gimbrere has showcased a more remarkable ability by triumphing in 53% of all matches played on the tour. These numbers hold significant implications for making informed decisions during in-game betting.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: While past performances provide considerable insights, assessing current event statistics is crucial to gauge the form of the players at the ongoing tournament. To access the most up-to-date information regarding the players' performances in the current event, please refer to the section below. Moreover, it is essential to consider that certain players may exhibit superior performance levels at specific events, amplifying this aspect's significance in predicting the final outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: Recent data reveals that Ferrer has capitalized on 47.37% of breakpoint opportunities, while Gimbrere has displayed a slightly lower conversion rate of 44.64% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistical insight proves valuable for in-game live betting tips, particularly when either player is on the brink of a potential breakthrough.
- For those interested in sophisticated models that excel at predicting tennis matches, we recommend delving into this insightful article. However, be advised that it caters specifically to statistics enthusiasts.
Claudia Hoste Ferrer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 4-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
Player
Eva Garkusha
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
90%
(
53 of
59)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
Player
Ekaterina Perelygina
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
49
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucia Ros Parres
Player
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
79%
(
48 of
61)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sapfo Sakellaridi
Player
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
Player
Anastasia Sukhotina
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
Player
Elena Grekul
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jasmijn Gimbrere Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Daley
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
48%
(
39 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
49%
(
39 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
48%
(
38 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Sara Dols
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
79%
(
119 of
150)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
70 of
119)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
67 of
150)
133
Total Points Won
126
|
6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Alicia Herrero Linana
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
79
|
6-0 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Ayana Akli
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
51% (216/208)
Win/Loss
54% (146/123)
51% (495/477)
Sets Win/Loss
53% (327/290)
50% (4441/4370)
Games Win/Loss
52% (2974/2760)
45% (30/36)
Hard Win/Loss
56% (50/40)
53% (181/161)
Clay Win/Loss
54% (65/56)
31% (5/11)
Indoor Hard W/L
55% (31/25)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/2)
0.12
Aces Per Game
0.12
520
Aces Total
337
0.26
Double Faults Per Game
0.31
1133
Total Double Faults
880
1:21:13
Average Match Time
1:23:10
480.17
Average Opponent Rank
487.68
62% (14144/22850)
1st Serve %
61% (8872/14468)
59% (8384/14144)
1st Serve Win %
60% (5315/8872)
44% (3802/8706)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (2405/5596)
50% (1406/2810)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (941/1991)
46% (10355/22498)
Return Points Win %
47% (6839/14489)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
40% (64/98)
Challenger W/L
52% (81/76)
58% (152/110)
Futures W/L
59% (65/45)
51% (215/420)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
54% (143/265)
0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
50% (35/70)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
45% (19/42)
50% (63/126)
Deciding Set Win %
53% (44/83)
82% (220/181)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (136/118)
17% (220/38)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (136/18)
17% (204/35)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
20% (133/27)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
