Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Claudia Giovine vs Emma Hurst Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Giovine vs Hurst analysis and find out who is favored!
Claudia Giovine vs Emma Hurst Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Giovine has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hurst has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Giovine, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hurst has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Giovine has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hurst has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Giovine has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Hurst winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Giovine has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 79/ 34), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 219/ 177). Hurst has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 15/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Giovine winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Giovine winning 2 and Hurst winning 1. The last match between Giovine and Hurst was at the Edgbaston, 07-02-2017, First, I.hard with Claudia Giovine getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:17:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Giovine and Hurst have played a deciding set 1 times, with Giovine winning 1 times and Hurst 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Giovine winning 0, and Hurst 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Giovine has played against opponents with an average rank of while Hurst has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Giovine has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hurst has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Giovine has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hurst has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Giovine 1 - 0 Hurst
Ret.
Rank
257
High
33
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
870
High
27
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
59% (350-247)
Career Total W/L
40% (30-45)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$860
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Claudia Giovine | Emma Hurst |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 12 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:17:0 | 2:17:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (66/100) | 67% (61/91) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (47/66) | 61% (37/61) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (12/34) | 37% (11/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 25% (3/12) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (43/91) | 41% (41/100) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 4-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Claudia Giovine
Player
Emma Hurst
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
2
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
3
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Claudia Giovine | Emma Hurst |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Claudia Giovine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Selena Janicijevic
Player
Claudia Giovine
64%
(
75 of
117)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
10
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
7
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
41 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Claudia Giovine
Player
Enola Chiesa
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Claudia Giovine
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
44%
(
26 of
59)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Claudia Giovine
Player
Ines Murta
39%
(
20 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
3
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
7
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Claudia Giovine
Player
Almudena Sanz-Llaneza Fernandez
45%
(
30 of
66)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
43)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Claudia Giovine
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
13
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-7(6) 7-6(3) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Claudia Giovine
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
11
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Emma Hurst Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amy Olivier
Player
Emma Hurst
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
66
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katharina Hering
Player
Emma Hurst
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura-Ioana Paar
Player
Emma Hurst
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Freya Christie
Player
Emma Hurst
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Hurst
Player
Lillian Mould
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margaux Orange
Player
Emma Hurst
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
48%
(
15 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
26 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Giovine Vs Hurst Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
