V. Hruncakova
To Win
J. Garland
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L L L LForm
L W W W W W W W W WThey have played 2 sets in total, with Vlasselaer winning 0 and Garland winning 2. The last match between Vlasselaer and Garland was at the W35 Manchester, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Joanna Garland getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
W35 Manchester(18-02-2025)
- / Final
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Joanna Garland
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
94%
(
32 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Prediction Insights for the Upcoming Tennis Match
In terms of second serve performance in recent form, Vlasselaer has displayed a 40.15% success rate, while Garland has shown a superior 51% success rate during the last six months. This statistical aspect holds a significant correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.
A glance at the return game statistics in recent form reveals that Vlasselaer has triumphed in an impressive 57.67% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Garland has demonstrated an even higher success rate of 62.89%. It is worth noting that these figures for first serve returns stand at 35.9% and 44.48% respectively, emphasizing their relevance in determining the favorite in their head-to-head matchup.
Examining how players perform under pressure, it is evident that Vlasselaer has successfully saved 57.45% of breakpoints in recent form. In comparison, Garland has displayed a slightly better rate of 59.89%. Such statistics prove invaluable when making predictions for in-game betting.
Considering performance over the past year, Vlasselaer has achieved a 50% win rate in matches played (W/L: 33/33). Meanwhile, Garland boasts an impressive 80.95% win rate (W/L: 51/12), which provides an overall prediction overview for their head-to-head encounter.
Regarding the best surface for each player, Vlasselaer has achieved their highest career win percentage on indoor hard courts, with a 55% success rate (W/L: 31/25). However, their performance on clay courts has been comparatively weaker, with a win percentage of 42% (W/L: 23/32). On the other hand, Garland excels on hard courts, with a remarkable 72% win rate (W/L: 152/60), while struggling on indoor hard courts, attaining a 46% win rate (W/L: 19/22).
When analyzing the players' level, it is evident that Vlasselaer has predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments with prize pools exceeding $10,000. Here, they have achieved a 48.33% win rate (W/L: 29/31). In contrast, Garland has primarily participated in the same category of tournaments, showcasing an impressive 81.25% win rate (W/L: 39/9). Therefore, it is essential to consider the event level to accurately predict the favorite.
Considering their opponents' quality, Vlasselaer has faced players with an average rank of 483.91 over the last 12 months. Conversely, Garland has encountered opponents with an average rank of 401.87.
In terms of deciding set performance, if the match extends to a decisive set, Vlasselaer has emerged victorious in 65% of such situations over the past year. On the other hand, Garland boasts a commendable 81% success rate in all matches played on tour. These statistics carry particular relevance for live predictions and betting.
While past player performance plays a crucial role in predicting tennis matches, it is equally imperative to analyze current event stats to evaluate the form of players throughout the ongoing competition. Therefore, referring to the section below for the current event stats is highly recommended. Additionally, certain players excel at specific events, which should be considered when gauging potential outcomes.
Examining break point conversion rates, Vlasselaer has impressively converted 49.57% of their breakpoint opportunities. Comparatively, Garland has achieved a slightly lower conversion rate of 48.67% when breaking their opponents' serve. These numbers provide valuable insights for in-game live betting tips when either player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
For those interested in models that predict tennis matches, the following article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it is worth noting that it caters specifically to those individuals with a passion for statistical analysis.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daria Frayman
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Zeel Desai
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
33%
(
8 of
24)
1st Serve %
37%
(
13 of
35)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
7 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
34
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Joanna Garland
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
94%
(
32 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Carolina Kuhl
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Ariana Arseneault
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
19 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
43 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Holly Hutchinson
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
75%
(
85 of
114)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
![]() ![]()
Joanna Garland
Player
Sofia Costoulas
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-0 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Joanna Garland
Player
Hiromi Abe
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Joanna Garland
Player
Vittoria Paganetti
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Joanna Garland
Player
Camilla Zanolini
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
F | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Joanna Garland
Player
Federica Di Sarra
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Joanna Garland
Player
Camilla Zanolini
48%
(
13 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
13 of
26)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
6 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
36
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Joanna Garland
Player
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Joanna Garland
Player
Dalila Spiteri
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
94%
(
17 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Joanna Garland
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
46
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H |
view more
See recent tennis photos of Vlasselaer and Garland
View full predicted draw for Garland