Clara Vlasselaer vs Carolina Kuhl Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L L W L W L
Form
W L L W L L W L W LH2H: Vlasselaer 2 - 0 Kuhl
They have played 5 sets in total, with Vlasselaer winning 4 and Kuhl winning 1. The last match between Vlasselaer and Kuhl was at the W35 Manchester, 17-02-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Clara Vlasselaer getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Clara Vlasselaer | 2 |
| Carolina Kuhl | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Manchester(17-02-2025)
Clara Vlasselaer
Carolina Kuhl
6
3
6
0
| Vlasselaer | Stats | Kuhl |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (8-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 36% (5-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 474 | Ranking | 436 |
| 398 | Highest Rank | 391 |
| 24 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 51% (165-159) | Career Total W/L | 56% (82-65) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gauff VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
17 May 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alcaraz VS Musetti PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
16 May 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Vlasselaer VS Kuhl H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Carolina Kuhl
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
| 3-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Carolina Kuhl
46%
(
41 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
8
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
9
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
43 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
Vlasselaer VS Kuhl H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 27 | Games Won | 16 |
| 16 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:58:37 | Average Match Time | 1:58:37 |
| 55% (75/137) | 1st Serve % | 66% (93/141) |
| 71% (53/75) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (53/93) |
| 42% (26/62) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (17/48) |
| 48% (12/25) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 54% (7/13) |
| 50% (71/141) | Return Points Win % | 42% (58/137) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vlasselaer vs Kuhl Match Preview :
- Analyzing Second Serve Performance: Recent form reveals that in the past six months, Kuhl has exhibited an impressive second serve performance, securing victory in 44.53% of points played. In contrast, Vlasselaer has displayed a slightly lower success rate, winning 39.96% of points. It is worthwhile to note that there exists a noteworthy correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Evaluating Return Game Stats: A thorough examination of return game statistics emphasizes the prowess of Kuhl in recent form. Within the last six months, Kuhl has successfully conquered 52.77% of their opponents' second serve points. In contrast, Vlasselaer has exhibited a slightly lower success rate, winning 57.55% of such points. Similarly, in terms of first serve returns, Kuhl has achieved a 39.86% success rate, whereas Vlasselaer has managed a slightly lower rate of 35.45%. These statistical figures possess a significant correlation in determining the favored contender in the forthcoming clash between the two.
- Examining Performance Under Pressure: A quantitative analysis of their recent form reveals that Kuhl has expertly saved 60.19% of breakpoints encountered. On the other hand, Vlasselaer has demonstrated a slightly lower success rate of 57.35%. This invaluable statistic holds considerable utility in making informed predictions regarding in-game betting opportunities.
- Comprehensive Performance Overview: Over the course of the past year, Kuhl has emerged victorious in 54.1% of their matches, with a win-loss record of 33/28. In comparison, Vlasselaer has achieved a success rate of 49.23%, boasting a win-loss record of 32/33. Taking these figures into account, we can construct a holistic head-to-head prediction overview.
- Optimal Surface Preference: When evaluating the players' career performance on different surfaces, it becomes evident that Kuhl excels on hard courts, boasting a remarkable 61% win rate (W/L 14/9). Conversely, their performance on indoor hard courts dips slightly, with a win rate of 52% (W/L 16/15). In contrast, Vlasselaer emerges as more formidable on indoor hard courts, attaining a 55% career win rate (W/L 30/25). However, their performance on clay courts proves less adept, with a win rate of 42% (W/L 23/32).
- Player Level Considerations: Within the past year, Kuhl has predominantly participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10,000, triumphing in 51.02% of matches (W/L 25/24). Conversely, Vlasselaer has mostly competed in similar Challengers/ITF tournaments, securing victory in 47.46% of matches (W/L 28/31). It is crucial to contextualize these statistics relative to the level of the events they have participated in when assessing their likelihood of emerging as the favorite.
- Prior Head-to-Head Encounters: The two players have crossed paths once in the past, resulting in Kuhl failing to secure a victory while Vlasselaer emerged triumphant. Over the course of their encounters, three sets were played, with Kuhl emerging victorious in one instance, while Vlasselaer secured victory in two sets. Most recently, at the W15 Monastir on 02-03-2022, Clara Vlasselaer achieved a hard-fought triumph with a final score of 3-6, 6-4, 6-3.
- Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: Historical matches between these competitors have exhibited an average duration of 2 hours, 29 minutes, and 0 seconds, highlighting the intensity of their encounters.
- Predicting the Deciding Set Outcome: Notably, Kuhl and Vlasselaer have engaged in one deciding set, resulting in Vlasselaer emerging victorious on the singular occasion. This statistical insight proves invaluable in foreseeing the outcome if the upcoming match extends to its full duration.
- Head-to-Head in Extreme Pressure Situations: It is illuminating to observe that the two competitors have not encountered any tiebreak situations in their previous head-to-head matches. Both Kuhl and Vlasselaer have yet to claim victory in a tiebreak against one another.
- Analyzing Opponent Quality: Revealing the caliber of their opponents, Kuhl has contested matches against players with an average ranking of 399.64 over the past twelve months. In a similar timeframe, Vlasselaer has faced opponents with an average ranking of 485. These figures provide valuable context when assessing their performance levels.
- Performance in Deciding Sets against All Players: Pertaining to live predictions and betting prospects, it is worth noting that Kuhl has emerged victorious in 42% of deciding sets played over the past twelve months. In contrast, Vlasselaer has achieved an impressive win rate of 65% in all matches played on the tour. These statistics offer crucial insights for live betting enthusiasts seeking to make informed decisions.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While analyzing past player performances offers valuable insights into predicting tennis matches, it is equally imperative to scrutinize current event statistics to gauge the players' current form. Please refer to the relevant section below (if the players have already competed in the ongoing event). Additionally, certain players exhibit enhanced performances in specific events, necessitating a careful consideration of this aspect when predicting the outcome.
- Break Point Conversion Rates: Recent statistical data reveals that Kuhl has successfully converted 49.69% of break point opportunities, while Vlasselaer has accomplished a slightly lower conversion rate of 49.33% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serves. This telling statistic holds significant value for in-game live betting tips, particularly when either player finds themselves with a break point opportunity.
- If your interest lies in models that accurately predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Warning: Intended for statistics enthusiasts only)
Vlasselaer vs Kuhl Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Clara Vlasselaer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alba Rey Garcia
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Kateryna Lazarenko
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Josy Daems
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Lina Soussi
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
104)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
53 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
33%
(
8 of
24)
1st Serve %
37%
(
13 of
35)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
7 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
34
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Carolina Kuhl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mara Gae
Player
Carolina Kuhl
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-0 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Timofeeva
Player
Carolina Kuhl
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(12) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Shilin Xu
Player
Carolina Kuhl
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
68%
(
17 of
25)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
46%
(
18 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
32
Total Points Won
32
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mercedes Aristegui
Player
Carolina Kuhl
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Linda Sevcikova
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ella Mcdonald
Player
Carolina Kuhl
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
49
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (165/159) | Win/Loss | 56% (82/65) |
| 52% (381/356) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (184/153) |
| 51% (3485/3345) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1568/1446) |
| 53% (111/100) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (14/9) |
| 42% (23/32) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (48/34) |
| 53% (31/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48% (20/22) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 778 | Aces Total | 250 |
| 0.42 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1406 | Total Double Faults | 444 |
| 1:30:36 | Average Match Time | 1:44:15 |
| 455.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 442.8 |
| 55% (9912/17974) | 1st Serve % | 61% (5872/9566) |
| 66% (6495/9912) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (3527/5872) |
| 43% (3461/8063) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1673/3694) |
| 47% (972/2085) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (638/1262) |
| 44% (7789/17537) | Return Points Win % | 48% (4592/9645) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 47% (76/85) | Challenger W/L | 49% (46/48) |
| 55% (89/74) | Futures W/L | 69% (36/16) |
| 51% (163/319) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (81/145) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (36/66) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (14/25) |
| 45% (41/91) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (24/45) |
| 82% (179/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (82/68) |
| 17% (179/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (82/14) |
| 12% (145/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (65/14) |
Vlasselaer vs. Kuhl Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
