Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Clara Burel vs Mariam Dalakishvili Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Burel vs Dalakishvili analysis and find out who is favored!
Clara Burel vs Mariam Dalakishvili Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Burel has won 43.19% of points on his second serve, while Dalakishvili has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Burel, in recent form, has won 60.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Dalakishvili has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.21% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Burel has saved 47.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dalakishvili has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Burel has won 65.08% of matches played (W/L 41/ 22), with Dalakishvili winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Burel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 44/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 72/ 56). Dalakishvili has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 34/ 32), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 17/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Burel has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 70.37% of matches (W/L 19/ 8), where as Dalakishvili has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Burel has played against opponents with an average rank of 179.62 while Dalakishvili has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Burel has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dalakishvili has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Burel has converted 49.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dalakishvili has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Burel 0 - 0 Dalakishvili
44
Rank
44
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
771
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
60% (160-108)
Career Total W/L
49% (51-53)
56% (10-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,264,038
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Burel VS Dalakishvili H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Clara Burel | Mariam Dalakishvili |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (23/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (203/188) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 58 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.48 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 92 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:33 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 147.06 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (715/1273) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (445/715) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (235/558) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (84/172) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (636/1352) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (10/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clara Burel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Clara Burel
Player
Katarina Zavatska
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
98
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Clara Burel
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Wozniacki
Player
Clara Burel
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Clara Burel
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
87)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
6
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
33%
(
12 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Xiyu Wang
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
73 of
118)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
118)
110
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Clara Burel
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Eva Lys
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
7
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
50 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Clara Burel
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Katerina Siniakova
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
30%
(
12 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
53%
(
49 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
56 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mariam Dalakishvili Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elena-Teodora Cadar
Player
Mariam Dalakishvili
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Mariam Dalakishvili
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
83%
(
77 of
93)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Mariam Dalakishvili
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
81%
(
88 of
109)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
51%
(
44 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
56 of
109)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Punnin Kovapitukted
Player
Mariam Dalakishvili
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
19 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Mariam Dalakishvili
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Dalakishvili
Player
Iuliia Nikitina
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
21%
(
4 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Bosio
Player
Mariam Dalakishvili
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Dalakishvili
Player
Vanda Lukacs
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iuliia Nikitina
Player
Mariam Dalakishvili
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
10
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julie Belgraver
Player
Mariam Dalakishvili
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve %
90%
(
9 of
10)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
19
Total Points Won
9
|
4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Burel Vs Dalakishvili Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Clara Burel
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
