Claire Liu vs Jamie Loeb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Liu vs Loeb analysis and find out who is favored!
Claire Liu vs Jamie Loeb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Liu has won 42.89% of points on his second serve, while Loeb has won 47.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Liu, in recent form, has won 55.95% of his opponent's second serve points, while Loeb has won 55.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.04% and 38.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Liu has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Loeb has saved 54.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Liu has won 50.94% of matches played (W/L 27/ 26), with Loeb winning 50% (W/L 30/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Liu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 84/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4). Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Liu has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 52% of matches (W/L 13/ 12), where as Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.88% of matches (W/L 29/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Liu winning 4 times. They have played 13 sets in total, with Liu winning 8 and Loeb winning 5. The last match between Liu and Loeb was at the Wimbledon - London, 22-06-2021, Q1 round, Grass with Claire Liu getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Liu and Loeb have played a deciding set 1 times, with Liu winning 1 times and Loeb 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Liu winning 1, and Loeb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Liu has played against opponents with an average rank of 177.91 while Loeb has played against players with an average rank of 289.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Liu has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Loeb has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Liu has converted 43.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Loeb has converted 47.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Liu 4 - 2 Loeb
7
Total
0
Mast
6
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
115
Rank
52
High
23
Age
R
Plays
4
Total2
2
Hard1
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
295
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
11
Total
0
Mast
8
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Form
58% (224-162)
Career Total W/L
55% (294-242)
53% (9-8)
YTD W/L
61% (14-9)
$1,080,496
Career Prize Money
$219,866
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Claire Liu | Jamie Loeb |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 4 | 2 |
Sets Won | 8 | 5 |
Games Won | 61 | 53 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 10 | 15 |
Avg Match Time | 1:13:35 | 1:13:35 |
1st Serve % | 65% (186/287) | 56% (169/300) |
1st Serve Win% | 59% (109/186) | 56% (94/169) |
2nd Serve Win% | 45% (45/101) | 46% (60/131) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 48% (20/42) | 46% (19/41) |
Return Points W% | 49% (146/300) | 46% (133/287) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 33% (2/6) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 67% (3/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 33% (3/1) |
1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (3/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-2 |
Claire Liu
Player
Jamie Loeb
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
6-2 6-4 |
Claire Liu
Player
Jamie Loeb
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
52%
(
17 of
33)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
28 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
6-1 6-0 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Claire Liu
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
6-4 6-2 |
Claire Liu
Player
Jamie Loeb
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
6-4 6-4 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Claire Liu
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
3-6 7-6(2) 6-0 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Claire Liu | Jamie Loeb |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 61% (14/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 50% (20/20) | 59% (32/22) |
Games Win/Loss | 48% (173/186) | 55% (272/222) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) | 80% (8/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 63% (5/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.3 |
Aces Total | 50 | 73 |
DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.29 |
DFs Total | 48 | 70 |
Avg Match Time | 1:44:17 | 1:42:18 |
Avg Opp Rank | 163.24 | 344.04 |
1st Serve % | 64% (747/1175) | 55% (855/1546) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (470/747) | 68% (579/855) |
2nd Serve W% | 43% (183/428) | 50% (343/690) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (59/139) | 48% (93/195) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (516/1180) | 45% (725/1594) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 61% (14/9) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (9/17) | 64% (14/22) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 43% (3/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 57% (4/7) |
1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 92% (13/12) |
1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 8% (13/1) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 20% (10/2) |
Claire Liu Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Shelby Rogers
Player
Claire Liu
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Claire Liu
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
107)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
12 of
40)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Claire Liu
Player
Sophie Chang
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Claire Liu
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
40
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Claire Liu
Player
Petra Martic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Claire Liu
Player
Greetje Minnen
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Claire Liu
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Mai Hontama
Player
Claire Liu
75%
(
79 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
105
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Claire Liu
Player
Maria Timofeeva
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jule Niemeier
Player
Claire Liu
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
SF |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Akasha Urhobo
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Kolie Allen
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jamie Loeb
Player
Bronte Murgett
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Valeria Savinykh
Player
Jamie Loeb
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Jamie Loeb
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more