T. Nikcevic
To Win
D. Astakhova
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W W L W LForm
W L L W L W W L W WThey have played 2 sets in total, with Langlais winning 2 and Nikcevic winning 0. The last match between Langlais and Nikcevic was at the W15 Monastir, 25-02-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Cindy Langlais getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Cindy Langlais | 1 |
Tea Nikcevic | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W15 Monastir(25-02-2025)
Langlais | Stats | Nikcevic |
---|---|---|
62% (8-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (7-6) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
N/A | Ranking | N/A |
Highest Rank | N/A | |
15 | Age | 19 |
- | Plays | - |
0 | Titles | 0 |
55% (17-14) | Career Total W/L | 49% (46-48) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
13 May 2025 / Fourth
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
14 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-0 |
![]() ![]()
Cindy Langlais
Player
Tea Nikcevic
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 3 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:8:49 | Average Match Time | 1:8:49 |
70% (40/57) | 1st Serve % | 55% (21/38) |
73% (29/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (13/21) |
59% (10/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (5/17) |
67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
53% (20/38) | Return Points Win % | 32% (18/57) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
How does second serve performance influence the likely victor in this tennis duel? Over the recent six months, Cindy Langlais has secured a mere 33.33% of points on her second serve, lagging behind Minja Nikcevic, who clinches 46.1% of her second serve points. This metric often serves as a reliable barometer for forecasting outcomes in the sport, underlining Nikcevic's potential edge in match predictions.
Yet, the plot thickens when considering return game statistics. Langlais has demonstrated an impressive skill, winning 66.67% of her opponent’s second serve points, overshadowing Nikcevic's 46.81%. When it comes to first serve returns, the statistics are closer; Langlais capitalizes on 44.68% compared to Nikcevic's 42.62%. Such numbers play a vital role in determining the favorite for this face-off.
Facing high-pressure situations, Nikcevic shows resilience, saving 50% of break points recently, starkly contrasting with Langlais, who currently saves 0%. This could sway the momentum in Nikcevic's favor during crucial match moments. Moreover, analyzing each player's overall performance, Langlais holds a slight edge with a win rate of 56.25% over the last year, in comparison to Nikcevic's 52.78%.
Surface preferences also provide intriguing insights. Langlais showcases her best win rate on Hard courts at 75%, while sharing a mixed record on Clay with 50% wins. Nikcevic, in comparison, excels on Hard surfaces with a 58% win rate but remains less prolific on Indoor Hard, with no wins in that area. Such data offers clues about their adaptability in varying conditions.
When evaluating their participation level, Langlais competes frequently in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, emerging victorious 60% of the time. Nikcevic is also a regular at this level, boasting a slightly lower success rate of 58.06%. These statistics suggest that while both players compete at similar levels, Langlais might have a slight competitive advantage.
In direct confrontations, Langlais leads, having won their only match against Nikcevic. This encounter, held at W 15 Monastir, saw her win decisively, 6-3, 6-0. This historical head-to-head puts Langlais in a favorable position for this upcoming contest. Additionally, over the last 12 months, Langlais has faced slightly tougher opponents, with their average ranking at 135.88 compared to Nikcevic's 171.67, suggesting her competitiveness against a stronger field.
Should the match progress to a deciding set, Nikcevic may have the upper hand, winning 57% of deciders in her recent endeavors, contrasting Langlais' 50%. Nonetheless, Langlais has the edge in direct battles, making this a fascinating clash that may hinge on critical moments. With Langlais converting 45.45% of break-point opportunities against Nikcevic's 58.06%, clutch plays will indubitably play a role.
The compelling stats tilt the prediction slightly towards Langlais, considering her head-to-head dominance and superior performance against stronger opponents. Nikcevic, however, may surprise, especially if the match extends to critical sets. As spectators, we anticipate dynamic exchanges and game-defining moments that will determine the ultimate victor. The stage is set for Langlais to potentially uphold her record against Nikcevic.
Langlais vs Nikcevic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Camilla Rosatello
Player
Cindy Langlais
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Cindy Langlais
Player
Manon Leonard
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alice Robbe
Player
Cindy Langlais
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
52%
(
44 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
99)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Cindy Langlais
Player
Ely Cordonnier
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Cindy Langlais
Player
Lola Collin
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kristina Kroitor
Player
Cindy Langlais
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
80%
(
40 of
50)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Cindy Langlais
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Cindy Langlais
Player
Dominika Podhajecka
74%
(
62 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Cindy Langlais
Player
Tea Nikcevic
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mirjana Jovanovic
Player
Tea Nikcevic
58%
(
67 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
71%
(
34 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
47 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
108
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-7(13) 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Cindy Langlais
Player
Tea Nikcevic
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 ret. | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
55% (17/14) | Win/Loss | 49% (46/48) |
54% (38/32) | Sets Win/Loss | 47% (94/106) |
51% (356/336) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (890/930) |
71% (5/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) |
50% (12/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (39/41) |
0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
4 | Aces Total | 68 |
0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
33 | Total Double Faults | 173 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
163.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 170.57 |
69% (739/1073) | 1st Serve % | 52% (1116/2164) |
53% (388/739) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (672/1116) |
48% (161/334) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (415/1048) |
49% (69/140) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (98/222) |
48% (509/1062) | Return Points Win % | 42% (899/2135) |
33% (1/2) | Challenger W/L | 28% (5/13) |
57% (16/12) | Futures W/L | 54% (41/35) |
55% (17/31) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (41/89) |
57% (4/7) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 40% (4/10) |
50% (4/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (10/17) |
88% (17/15) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (49/44) |
12% (17/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (49/5) |
14% (14/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (45/2) |