Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cindy Burger vs Camilla Scala Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Burger vs Scala analysis and find out who is favored!
Cindy Burger vs Camilla Scala Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Burger has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Scala has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Burger, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Scala has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Burger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Scala has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Burger has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Scala winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Burger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 283/ 180), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Scala has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 157/ 121), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Burger winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Burger winning 2 and Scala winning 0. The last match between Burger and Scala was at the Santa Margherita Di Pula, 03-10-2017, First, Clay with Cindy Burger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Burger and Scala have played a deciding set 0 times, with Burger winning 0 times and Scala 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Burger winning 0, and Scala 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Burger has played against opponents with an average rank of while Scala has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Burger has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Scala has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Burger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Scala has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Burger 1 - 0 Scala
Ret.
Rank
134
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
391
High
29
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
59% (325-229)
Career Total W/L
54% (170-142)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$44,173
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Cindy Burger | Camilla Scala |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:0 | 1:19:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (35/57) | 62% (40/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (20/35) | 50% (20/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (13/22) | 36% (9/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (36/65) | 42% (24/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Cindy Burger
Player
Camilla Scala
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cindy Burger | Camilla Scala |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cindy Burger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Natalia Szabanin
Player
Cindy Burger
45%
(
33 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Sinja Kraus
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raluca Georgiana Serban
Player
Cindy Burger
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
10
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Jesika Maleckova
43%
(
40 of
92)
1st Serve %
39%
(
30 of
76)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
35%
(
18 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
12 of
46)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
51%
(
47 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Arina Gabriela Vasilescu
34%
(
22 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
6
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
31%
(
13 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
52%
(
33 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Marine Partaud
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Sina Herrmann
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cindy Burger
Player
Bente Spee
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
28%
(
9 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Camilla Scala Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Detiuc
Player
Camilla Scala
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve %
46%
(
6 of
13)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
9
|
4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Camilla Scala
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve %
46%
(
13 of
28)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
42
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilla Scala
Player
Stefania Rubini
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilla Scala
Player
Lisa Pigato
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilla Scala
Player
Deborah Chiesa
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 7-6(0) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilla Scala
Player
Verena Meliss
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentyna Ivakhnenko
Player
Camilla Scala
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilla Scala
Player
Claire Liu
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
2
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Burger Vs Scala Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
