C. H. Tseng
To Win
S. Nagal
To Win
Chun Hsin Tseng vs Chris Rodesch Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W L L L
Form
W W L L W L W W W LHead-2-Head: Tseng 1 - 0 Rodesch
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tseng winning 2 and Rodesch winning 0. The last match between Tseng and Rodesch was at the Vicenza Challenger, 31-05-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Clay, with Chun Hsin Tseng getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chun Hsin Tseng | 1 |
| Chris Rodesch | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Vicenza Challenger(31-05-2025)
Chun Hsin Tseng
Chris Rodesch
6
4
6
3
| Tseng | Stats | Rodesch |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (26-21) | YTD Win/Loss | 66% (31-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 96 | Ranking | 163 |
| 83 | Highest Rank | 163 |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 10 | Titles | 8 |
| 58% (265-188) | Career Total W/L | 71% (117-48) |
| $383,855 | Career Prize Money | $66,000 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
08 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Siegemund PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Shelton PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Chris Rodesch
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:21:38 | Average Match Time | 1:21:38 |
| 67% (34/51) | 1st Serve % | 70% (49/70) |
| 76% (26/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (36/49) |
| 71% (12/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (7/21) |
| 25% (3/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
| 39% (27/70) | Return Points Win % | 25% (13/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tseng vs Rodesch Match Preview :
- In recent form, Rodesch has a slight edge over Tseng, winning 47.16% of second serve points compared to Tseng's 46.77%.
- While assessing return game stats, Tseng appears stronger, winning 45.81% of opponents' second serves, whereas Rodesch trails at 43.14%.
- Both players show comparable abilities in first serve returns, with Tseng at 26.7% and Rodesch closely matching at 26.69%.
- Breakpoint scenarios find Tseng with a slight advantage, saving 57.29% compared to Rodesch's 56.18%.
- In match performance guidance, Rodesch has a superior win ratio from the past year, winning 77.17% of matches compared to Tseng at 56.1%.
- Rodesch shines on Hard surfaces with an 83% win rate, while Tseng performs best on Clay at 61%.
- Recent player levels suggest Rodesch is performing extraordinarily at Futures/ITF levels, achieving an 89.36% win rate against Tseng's 67.39% in Challengers/ITF.
- Tseng faces slightly higher-ranked opponents on average, with a rank of 251.62, while Rodesch's average opponent rank is 385.96.
- If a deciding set arises, Rodesch's strong 74% victory rate outshines Tseng's 52% success in such scenarios.
- Analyzing breakpoint conversion shows Tseng is more effective, converting 29.03% of opportunities compared to Rodesch at 27.32%.
Editorial Prediction (May 31, 2025, UTC):
When considering the upcoming tennis match between Tseng and Rodesch, both players have demonstrated distinct strengths and weaknesses. While Tseng exhibits a slightly superior return game and breakpoint conversion, Rodesch's overall match performance and success in deciding sets significantly stand out.
The better performance of Tseng when facing higher-ranked opponents is noteworthy, yet Rodesch’s remarkable win percentage on Hard courts and superior win-to-loss ratio over the past year establish a formidable case.
Taking into account these performance trends and statistical indicators, Rodesch seems more likely to emerge victorious in this forthcoming tennis match, given his consistent prowess and ability to excel during crucial moments.
Tseng vs Rodesch Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Chun Hsin Tseng Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
53%
(
67 of
126)
1st Serve %
59%
(
85 of
144)
11
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
9
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
61 of
85)
51%
(
30 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
33%
(
42 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
60 of
144)
144
Total Points Won
126
|
6-3 6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
12 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
56%
(
63 of
113)
1st Serve %
63%
(
76 of
121)
6
Aces
14
6
Double Faults
8
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
56 of
76)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
39 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
45 of
121)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Jurij Rodionov
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Luca Van Assche
44%
(
26 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Chris Rodesch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Cristian Garin
Player
Chris Rodesch
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
76 of
104)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
57 of
68)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
57 of
76)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
22 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(8) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Marton Fucsovics
74%
(
90 of
121)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
115)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
8
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
54 of
70)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
41 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
115)
117
Total Points Won
119
|
6-3 6-4 0-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Mark Lajal
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Matteo Gigante
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Chris Rodesch
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
46 of
62)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
76%
(
82 of
108)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
102)
19
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
60 of
82)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
46 of
58)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
35 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
32 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Chris Rodesch
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Chris Rodesch
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (265/188) | Win/Loss | 71% (117/48) |
| 56% (602/467) | Sets Win/Loss | 66% (251/130) |
| 52% (5262/4763) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2034/1646) |
| 58% (103/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 83% (38/8) |
| 62% (140/85) | Clay Win/Loss | 73% (58/22) |
| 49% (21/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (17/15) |
| 14% (1/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
| 1159 | Aces Total | 746 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1074 | Total Double Faults | 447 |
| 1:43:21 | Average Match Time | 1:33:13 |
| 404.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 395.16 |
| 59% (18336/31036) | 1st Serve % | 68% (7060/10375) |
| 68% (12440/18336) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (4996/7060) |
| 51% (6527/12700) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1712/3315) |
| 42% (1384/3317) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (444/1095) |
| 41% (12834/31343) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4237/10500) |
| 33% (6/12) | Slam W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 45% (9/11) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (7/5) | Cups W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 32% (12/25) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (162/107) | Challenger W/L | 58% (30/22) |
| 71% (69/28) | Futures W/L | 80% (80/20) |
| 60% (259/432) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 72% (116/162) |
| 7% (1/14) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 47% (62/132) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (32/60) |
| 55% (83/152) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (33/49) |
| 85% (261/221) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (110/101) |
| 15% (261/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (110/9) |
| 23% (192/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (55/16) |
Tseng vs. Rodesch Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
