A. Pecci
To Win
C. Negritu
To Win
Christoph Negritu vs Toby Samuel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L W W W L
Form
W L L W L W W W W LHead-2-Head: Negritu 1 - 0 Samuel
They have played 3 sets in total, with Negritu winning 2 and Samuel winning 1. The last match between Negritu and Samuel was at the Glasgow Challenger, 17-02-2025, Q3, I.hard with Christoph Negritu getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-7(7) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Christoph Negritu | 1 |
| Toby Samuel | 0 |
Glasgow Challenger(17-02-2025)
7
6
6
7
6
4
Upcoming Match
23 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Zverev VS Thompson PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Raducanu VS Kessler PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
23 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 6-7(7) 6-4 |
Stats 
Christoph Negritu
Player
Toby Samuel
69%
(
91 of
132)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
122)
19
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
52 of
74)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
51 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
122)
127
Total Points Won
127
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
1
19
Games Won
17
19
Aces (Total)
9
1
Total Double Faults
3
2:43:38
Average Match Time
2:43:38
69% (91/132)
1st Serve %
61% (74/122)
73% (66/91)
1st Serve Win %
70% (52/74)
37% (15/41)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (24/48)
43% (3/7)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (2/4)
38% (46/122)
Return Points Win %
39% (51/132)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
50% (1/2)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Christoph Negritu vs Toby Samuel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Christoph Negritu 1 - 0 Toby Samuel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent times, Negritu and Samuel have displayed contrasting performances in their second serve. Negritu triumphed in 49.34% of points on their second serve, whereas Samuel's success rate was slightly higher at 51.12%. This statistic bears a significant correlation to the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return game stats recent form: Analyzing the return game statistics of Negritu and Samuel in recent encounters, Negritu emerged victorious in 52.45% of their opponent's second serve points, while Samuel's success rate stood at a marginally higher 52.75%. Similarly, in first serve returns, Negritu achieved a 33.2% success rate, whereas Samuel garnered 36.51%. These numbers hold a strong correlation to determine the favored player in their head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: When placed under pressure, Negritu has proven their mettle by saving 63.94% of breakpoints in recent times. On the other hand, Samuel's resilience has allowed them to save 62.5% of breakpoints. This valuable statistic can greatly assist in predicting in-game betting outcomes.
- Performance overview: Assessing their overall performance in the past year, Negritu has claimed victory in 64.47% of matches played, boasting a win-loss record of 49/27. Conversely, Samuel has triumphed in 66.67% of matches (W/L 6/3). These figures provide a comprehensive overview for predicting the head-to-head results.
- Best surface: Negritu has showcased their exceptional proficiency on hard courts, with a career surface win percentage of 61% (W/L 143/93). However, their performance on clay has been relatively weaker, with a win percentage of 57% (W/L 137/104). Conversely, Samuel excels on hard courts, recording a career surface win percentage of 76% (W/L 19/6), but struggles on indoor hard courts, achieving a win percentage of 62% (W/L 18/11).
- Player level: In the past year, Negritu has predominantly competed in Challenger/ITF tournaments valued at over $10,000, securing victory in 64.44% of matches (W/L 29/16). Conversely, Samuel has primarily participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments worth $10,000, emerging triumphantly in 62.5% of matches (W/L 5/3). When comparing these statistics to predict the favored player, the context of the event level must always be considered.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the previous 12 months, Negritu has faced opponents with an average ranking of 403.04, whereas Samuel has encountered players with an average ranking of 521.44. This information sheds light on the level of competition each player has faced and can be a vital factor in predicting match outcomes.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is imperative to note that Negritu has been highly successful in deciding sets, winning 69% of such sets in the past year. In contrast, Samuel has failed to secure a single victory in deciding sets across all matches played on the tour. This statistic holds significant value when anticipating the outcome of matches that reach the deciding set stage.
- Current event H2H stats: While historical player performance provides valuable insights in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to analyze current event statistics for an indication of a player's current form. For this purpose, please refer to the section below, specifically tailored to provide up-to-date information regarding player performance in the ongoing event. Additionally, certain players exhibit superior performances at particular events, and this factor should be duly considered when making outcome predictions.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Negritu has demonstrated a 37.47% conversion rate in seizing breakpoint opportunities, while Samuel has capitalized on 38.75% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These statistics offer valuable insights for in-game live betting tips when either player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are seeking models that provide accurate tennis match predictions, the following article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it is important to note that the content caters primarily to avid statisticians and enthusiasts in the field.
Christoph Negritu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Christoph Negritu
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Dennis Novak
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
77 of
118)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
53 of
118)
111
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Stefanos Sakellaridis
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Lorenzo Giustino
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Christoph Negritu
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
43 of
53)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Christoph Negritu
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Toby Samuel
69%
(
91 of
132)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
122)
19
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
52 of
74)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
51 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
122)
127
Total Points Won
127
|
7-6(6) 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Ewen Lumsden
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
120)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
113
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Christoph Negritu
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Toby Samuel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Steven Diez
Player
Toby Samuel
53%
(
46 of
87)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
42 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
5-7 6-4 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Nico Hipfl
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Toby Samuel
69%
(
91 of
132)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
122)
19
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
52 of
74)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
51 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
122)
127
Total Points Won
127
|
7-6(6) 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Michael Agwi
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Toby Samuel
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Bondioli
Player
Toby Samuel
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
73%
(
80 of
109)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
48 of
80)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
47%
(
49 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
53 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
David Poljak
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
58% (338/249)
Win/Loss
69% (55/25)
56% (756/584)
Sets Win/Loss
68% (123/59)
53% (6656/5960)
Games Win/Loss
57% (996/760)
61% (147/95)
Hard Win/Loss
77% (23/7)
57% (137/104)
Clay Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
52% (54/50)
Indoor Hard W/L
60% (18/12)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
70% (14/6)
0.31
Aces Per Game
0.42
1927
Aces Total
362
0.1
Double Faults Per Game
0.2
610
Total Double Faults
172
1:21:11
Average Match Time
1:33:37
474.46
Average Opponent Rank
455.74
60% (19259/32222)
1st Serve %
65% (3481/5346)
69% (13345/19259)
1st Serve Win %
71% (2483/3481)
48% (6210/12963)
2nd Serve Win %
51% (958/1865)
43% (1476/3469)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (250/565)
41% (13332/32166)
Return Points Win %
41% (2219/5390)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
50% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
60% (38/25)
Challenger W/L
38% (5/8)
57% (300/224)
Futures W/L
75% (49/16)
57% (331/576)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
70% (55/79)
100% (3/3)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
52% (88/169)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
54% (14/26)
51% (87/172)
Deciding Set Win %
43% (9/21)
86% (346/297)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (60/52)
14% (346/47)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (60/8)
17% (241/40)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
15% (20/3)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
