Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Christina McHale vs Nao Hibino Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our McHale vs Hibino analysis and find out who is favored!
Christina McHale vs Nao Hibino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), McHale has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hibino has won 44.48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show McHale, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hibino has won 54.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 37.04% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: McHale has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hibino has saved 54.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year McHale has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Hibino winning 54.93% (W/L 39/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, McHale has played against opponents with an average rank of while Hibino has played against players with an average rank of 202.28.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, McHale has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hibino has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, McHale has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hibino has converted 48.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: McHale 0 - 0 Hibino
N/A
Rank
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Christina McHale | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 1st Match | 56% (14/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 1st Match | 51% (32/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 1st Match | 51% (290/274) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 1st Match | 55% (12/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 1st Match | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 1st Match | 100% (2/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 1st Match | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 1st Match | 46 |
| DFs per game | 1st Match | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 1st Match | 64 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:45:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 1st Match | 146.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 1st Match | 67% (1239/1842) |
| 1st Serve W% | 1st Match | 63% (778/1239) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 1st Match | 46% (276/603) |
| BPs Won% Total | 1st Match | 47% (102/218) |
| Return Pts W% | 1st Match | 44% (815/1869) |
| Slam W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 1st Match | 67% (8/4) |
| Cups W/L | 1st Match | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 1st Match | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 1st Match | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 1st Match | 56% (14/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 1st Match | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 1st Match | 69% (9/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 1st Match | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 1st Match | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 1st Match | 38% (13/5) |
Christina McHale Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Ysaline Bonaventure
Player
Christina Mchale
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yue Yuan
Player
Christina Mchale
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Christina Mchale
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christina Mchale
Player
Grace Min
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Christina Mchale
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Christina Mchale
84%
(
61 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christina Mchale
Player
Maria Mateas
58%
(
60 of
104)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
3
Aces
4
12
Double Faults
7
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Christina Mchale
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christina Mchale
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Christina Mchale
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Julia Riera
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
47%
(
43 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
McHale Vs Hibino Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
