N. Serdarusic
To Win
L. Mikrut
To Win
Christian Sigsgaard vs Nino Serdarusic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W W W W
Form
W L W L L L L W L LHead-to-head: Sigsgaard 1 - 0 Serdarusic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sigsgaard winning 2 and Serdarusic winning 0. The last match between Sigsgaard and Serdarusic was at the M25 Trento, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Christian Sigsgaard getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-2.
M25 Trento(18-02-2025)
7
6
6
2
86% (6-1)
YTD Win/Loss
25% (1-3)
1
Head-to-Head
0
545
Ranking
604
545
Highest Rank
167
28
Age
28
-
Plays
R
2
Titles
8
64% (110-61)
Career Total W/L
53% (359-313)
$0
Career Prize Money
$79,735
1
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
0
1
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Upcoming Match
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kartal VS Burrage PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Birrell VS Sasnovich PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sigsgaard VS Serdarusic H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-2 |
Stats 
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Nino Serdarusic
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Sigsgaard VS Serdarusic H2H Stats
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
13
Games Won
8
9
Aces (Total)
10
3
Total Double Faults
1
1:13:35
Average Match Time
1:13:35
62% (36/58)
1st Serve %
68% (50/74)
89% (32/36)
1st Serve Win %
70% (35/50)
55% (12/22)
2nd Serve Win %
38% (9/24)
60% (3/5)
Break Points Won % (Total)
100% (1/1)
41% (30/74)
Return Points Win %
24% (14/58)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Christian Sigsgaard vs Nino Serdarusic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Christian Sigsgaard 1 - 0 Nino Serdarusic
- Notable second serve performance: In the past six months, Sigsgaard has displayed a commendable record on their second serve, winning 51.89% of points, while Serdarusic has achieved a success rate of 49.17%. This particular statistic, which showcases their prowess in this area, holds significant importance when it comes to predicting match outcomes.
- Return game statistics: Examining the return statistics of Sigsgaard reveals that, in recent form, they have triumphed in 56.15% of points on their opponent's second serve. Conversely, Serdarusic has secured a success rate of 40.17% in this aspect. As for the first serve returns, Sigsgaard boasts a 35.63% success rate, while Serdarusic has recorded 30.43%. These statistics prove to be influential factors in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
- Performance under pressure: When facing pivotal moments, Sigsgaard has impressively saved 67.44% of breakpoints in recent form. On the other hand, Serdarusic has demonstrated a slightly lower efficiency by saving 57.58%. This statistic holds considerable value for those engaging in in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the course of the past year, Sigsgaard has emerged victorious in 66.67% of their matches (16 wins / 8 losses). Meanwhile, Serdarusic has achieved a success rate of 47.62% (20 wins / 22 losses). These figures provide a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head record.
- Surface strengths and weaknesses: Sigsgaard has showcased their utmost proficiency on clay courts, where they have achieved a remarkable 64% success rate (27 wins / 15 losses). Conversely, their performance on grass courts has been less impressive, with a 0% success rate (0 wins / 1 loss). Serdarusic, similarly, excels on clay courts, boasting a 58% success rate (304 wins / 223 losses), while their performance on grass courts remains subpar, with a 0% success rate (0 wins / 2 losses).
- Player level: In the previous year, Sigsgaard has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with $10K prize pools, winning 66.67% of their matches (16 wins / 8 losses). Conversely, Serdarusic has primarily participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments with prize pools exceeding $10K, achieving a 44% success rate (11 wins / 14 losses). When assessing players' statistics to determine the favored candidate, it is essential to consider the level of the events in which they have been competing.
- Opponent quality statistics: Over the past twelve months, Sigsgaard has faced opponents with an average ranking of 459.67, while Serdarusic has encountered players with an average ranking of 411.38.
- Deciding set performance: For those intrigued by live predictions and betting opportunities, analyzing players' performance in deciding sets becomes crucial. In the last twelve months, Sigsgaard has emerged triumphant in 60% of deciding sets played, while Serdarusic has achieved a success rate of 44% in all matches on the tour.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: The significance of historical player performance in predicting tennis matches cannot be undermined. However, once a particular event is underway, it is imperative to consider the current event statistics as well, as they provide insights into a player's current form. For this purpose, please refer to the section below (eventStats) if the players have participated in matches during the ongoing event. Additionally, certain players often exhibit enhanced performances in specific events, and this aspect should be considered when determining the eventual outcome.
- Break point conversion: Analyzing recent form, Sigsgaard has successfully converted 40.48% of their breakpoints, while Serdarusic has capitalized on 32.73% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This crucial statistic provides valuable tips for live in-game betting when either player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
- Should you be interested in models that accurately predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Warning: Only suitable for avid statistics enthusiasts)
Christian Sigsgaard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Daniil Glinka
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
78%
(
28 of
36)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
44
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Marvin Moeller
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Dennis Novak
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Alessandro Pecci
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Nino Serdarusic
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
10
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Rafael Ymer
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Tibo Colson
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
3
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
76
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nino Serdarusic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Nino Serdarusic
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Nino Serdarusic
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Juan Ignacio Zamora
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
88%
(
38 of
43)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Nino Serdarusic
48%
(
32 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Nino Serdarusic
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve %
56%
(
14 of
25)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
4 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
34
Total Points Won
15
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Nino Serdarusic
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
43 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
14 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Nino Serdarusic
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
67%
(
77 of
115)
10
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
64%
(
30 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
26%
(
27 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
115)
117
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Lucas Miedler
79%
(
63 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blaz Rola
Player
Nino Serdarusic
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Sebastian Sorger
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
64% (110/61)
Win/Loss
53% (359/313)
64% (246/140)
Sets Win/Loss
53% (810/715)
56% (2012/1590)
Games Win/Loss
52% (7449/6843)
64% (54/31)
Hard Win/Loss
35% (18/34)
64% (27/15)
Clay Win/Loss
58% (304/223)
67% (29/14)
Indoor Hard W/L
41% (37/54)
0% (0/1)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/2)
0.22
Aces Per Game
0.37
380
Aces Total
2564
0.13
Double Faults Per Game
0.21
232
Total Double Faults
1472
1:12:8
Average Match Time
1:28:4
432.23
Average Opponent Rank
515.33
67% (5515/8291)
1st Serve %
61% (24234/39990)
67% (3710/5515)
1st Serve Win %
71% (17177/24234)
53% (1468/2776)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (7801/15756)
48% (436/909)
Break Points Won % (Total)
43% (1665/3912)
43% (3646/8506)
Return Points Win %
39% (15557/39528)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
31% (4/9)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
29% (2/5)
Cups W/L
100% (1/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
27% (7/19)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L
45% (138/171)
66% (108/56)
Futures W/L
65% (209/114)
64% (106/165)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
53% (353/662)
67% (2/3)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
67% (2/3)
55% (23/42)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
50% (92/184)
38% (16/42)
Deciding Set Win %
49% (90/185)
87% (116/101)
1st Set Won, Won Match
85% (368/314)
13% (116/15)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
15% (368/54)
16% (55/9)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
15% (304/45)
See recent tennis photos of Sigsgaard and Serdarusic
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
