Christian Sigsgaard vs Alec Deckers Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Alec Deckers shows a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 47.52% of points, compared to Christian Sigsgaard’s 46.15% over the last six months. Could this make a difference in their upcoming match?
• Both players perform similarly in returning second serves, with Deckers winning 43.49% and Sigsgaard 41.52%, yet Sigsgaard shines in returning first serves at 29.35% versus Deckers' 22.17%.
• Under pressure, Deckers has proven more resilient, saving 58.37% of breakpoints, whereas Sigsgaard has a breakpoint save percentage of 50.00%.
• Over the past year, Deckers has a win rate of 76.92%, slightly higher than Sigsgaard’s 70.00%, though Sigsgaard has played more matches (W/L 28/12 vs. 20/6).
• On their preferred surface, I.hard, both players boast a winning percentage of 78%, indicating no clear advantage for either player on this surface.
• In terms of competition level, Deckers and Sigsgaard have both predominantly played in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with win rates of 76.92% and 75.76% respectively, highlighting comparable performance levels.
• The average rank of Deckers' opponents over the past year is 362.46, slightly higher in difficulty compared to Sigsgaard’s average opponent rank of 396.23.
• In deciding sets, Deckers comes out stronger, winning 75% of these matches, whereas Sigsgaard has a success rate of 57% in the same scenario.
• Keeping an eye on current event statistics can offer valuable insights regarding which player is in form during the tournament, making it an important factor in predicting outcomes.

Editorial Prediction (October 17, 2025, UTC):

In evaluating the head-to-head statistics of Alec Deckers and Christian Sigsgaard, Deckers appears to have a slight advantage in several key areas. His superior performance under pressure and higher win rate in deciding sets give him a notable edge.

While both players exhibit strong overall performance and comparable win rates on I.hard surfaces, Deckers’ ability to perform better against higher-ranked opponents and his higher breakpoint saving percentage suggest a tactical advantage.

Given these factors, Alec Deckers is projected to have a marginal upper hand in the upcoming match, making him the likely winner, although the competition remains close.