Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Christian Samuelsson vs Jonas ERIKSSON Ziverts Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Samuelsson vs Ziverts analysis and find out who is favored!
Christian Samuelsson vs Jonas ERIKSSON Ziverts Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Samuelsson has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ziverts has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Samuelsson, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ziverts has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Samuelsson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ziverts has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Samuelsson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ziverts winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Samuelsson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 36/ 27), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 11/ 15). Ziverts has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Samuelsson has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ziverts has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Samuelsson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ziverts has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Samuelsson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ziverts has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Samuelsson 0 - 0 Ziverts
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Samuelsson VS Ziverts H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Christian Samuelsson | Jonas ERIKSSON Ziverts |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Christian Samuelsson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Laurent Lokoli
Player
Christian Samuelsson
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
117)
110
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Christian Samuelsson
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
8
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
7
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Samuelsson
Player
Jake Hersey
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
10
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christian Samuelsson
Player
Llewelyn Bevan
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 4-6 15-13 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Christian Samuelsson
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Samuelsson
Player
Arthur Hugounenq
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joffrey De Schepper
Player
Christian Samuelsson
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
8
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
46 of
56)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
24 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(7) 6-7(5) 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Christian Samuelsson
Player
Cesar Bouchelaghem
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
23
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
12 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Petr Michnev
Player
Christian Samuelsson
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
14
Aces
19
3
Double Faults
12
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
32 of
36)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Jonas ERIKSSON Ziverts Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Pel
Player
Jonas Eriksson Ziverts
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Eriksson Ziverts
Player
Saba George Nanobashvili
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Papa
Player
Jonas Eriksson Ziverts
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Jonas Eriksson Ziverts
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jonas Eriksson Ziverts
Player
Nicholas Godsick
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Eriksson Ziverts
Player
Enzo Wallart
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Samuelsson Vs Ziverts Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
