Christian Langmo vs Jason Murray Kubler Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L W W L
Form
W W W W W W W W W LHead-to-head: Langmo 0 - 3 Kubler
They have played 6 sets in total, with Langmo winning 0 and Kubler winning 6. The last match between Langmo and Kubler was at the M25 Launceston, 01-03-2025, Semifinals, Hard with Jason Murray Kubler getting the victory 7-6(10) 7-5.
M25 Launceston(01-03-2025)
7
6
7
5
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rune VS Draper PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
17 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Dart VS Saville PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(10) 7-5 |
Stats 
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Christian Langmo
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Christian Langmo
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
76%
(
56 of
74)
9
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Christian Langmo
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
3
0
Sets Won
6
24
Games Won
38
27
Aces (Total)
18
7
Total Double Faults
8
1:38:18
Average Match Time
1:38:18
70% (150/213)
1st Serve %
65% (118/182)
68% (102/150)
1st Serve Win %
79% (93/118)
48% (30/63)
2nd Serve Win %
63% (40/64)
13% (1/8)
Break Points Won % (Total)
42% (8/19)
27% (49/182)
Return Points Win %
38% (81/213)
0% (0/3)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (3/3)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (3/3)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (3/0)
0% (3/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Christian Langmo vs Jason Murray Kubler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Christian Langmo 0 - 3 Jason Murray Kubler
In recent form, Langmo has been winning 46.82% of points on his second serve, while Kubler has managed 46.27%. This serves as an important indicator of potential outcomes in their matches. In the context of pressure situations, Langmo has demonstrated the ability to save 63.47% of breakpoints, significantly higher than Kubler's 54.46%, influencing predictions for in-game scenarios.
Examining return game statistics over the same period shows Langmo claiming 44.11% of his opponent's second serve points, whereas Kubler has achieved a slightly higher success rate with 46.1%. Analyzing returns on the first serve, Langmo has won 21.8%, closely matched by Kubler at 21.65%. These figures heavily contribute to establishing a favorite in head-to-head encounters.
A performance overview over the last year reveals Langmo winning 62.82% of his matches (record: 49/29), compared to Kubler, who has triumphed in 76.92% (record: 20/6). Langmo's best career surface win percentage is on hard courts, with a record of 60% (199/131), while his performance on indoor hard courts is comparatively weaker at 33% (2/4). For Kubler, clay is his best surface, boasting a 70% win rate (243/105), and his indoor hard court success is at 38% (6/10).
When considering player levels, Langmo has completed most of his matches in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, winning 54.17% (26/22), whereas Kubler has primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at $10K, with an impressive win percentage of 88.24% (15/2). It is important to note the relative level of events when comparing these statistics to predict a favorite.
In direct head-to-head matchups, Kubler leads significantly, having won both encounters against Langmo. Across four sets in total, Langmo has not secured a single victory, while Kubler has claimed all four. The last meeting at the Brisbane 2 Challenger's semifinals concluded with Kubler triumphing 6-4, 6-4, in a match lasting approximately 1:30:14. Although they have faced no deciding sets or tiebreaks, their past performance in decisive sets suggests Langmo has a 69% win rate compared to Kubler's 50% over the last year.
In terms of break point conversion, in their recent form, Kubler appears more adept, converting 30.11% of opportunities, compared to Langmo's 24.24%. This aspect can be crucial for live betting predictions when either player faces break point chances. Additionally, the average rank of opponents over the last year is slightly lower for Kubler at 434.54, in comparison to Langmo's 393.
Based on these comprehensive statistics and historical performances, Kubler appears favored to win in upcoming contests against Langmo. The past head-to-head results, combined with recent form, suggest that Kubler holds an edge, especially given his superior match-winning percentage and break-point conversion rates.
Christian Langmo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Christian Langmo
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Scott Jones
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
16 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Christian Langmo
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Pavle Marinkov
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Naoki Tajima
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
16
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
33%
(
36 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Seongbin Sim
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
100%
(
8 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
80)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Christian Langmo
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Scott Jones
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jason Murray Kubler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
57)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Cruz Hewitt
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Christian Langmo
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Joshua Sheehy
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
6
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Shintaro Imai
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Joshua Charlton
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Omar Jasika
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Dane Sweeny
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
109)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
58% (244/176)
Win/Loss
67% (429/211)
56% (546/422)
Sets Win/Loss
64% (952/540)
52% (4891/4539)
Games Win/Loss
55% (7738/6280)
60% (199/132)
Hard Win/Loss
66% (150/79)
51% (41/39)
Clay Win/Loss
70% (243/105)
33% (2/4)
Indoor Hard W/L
38% (6/10)
67% (2/1)
Grass Win/Loss
64% (30/17)
0.58
Aces Per Game
0.29
2664
Aces Total
2016
0.25
Double Faults Per Game
0.26
1148
Total Double Faults
1760
1:32:3
Average Match Time
1:8:28
459.2
Average Opponent Rank
497.18
63% (15747/25131)
1st Serve %
62% (18381/29885)
74% (11621/15747)
1st Serve Win %
71% (13095/18381)
50% (4697/9384)
2nd Serve Win %
51% (5819/11503)
38% (844/2210)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (1350/3070)
37% (9395/25608)
Return Points Win %
40% (12069/30106)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
51% (24/23)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
36% (4/7)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
50% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
47% (24/27)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
49% (64/66)
Challenger W/L
66% (158/80)
62% (180/110)
Futures W/L
75% (218/73)
58% (241/412)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
68% (410/599)
100% (2/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
48% (15/31)
56% (79/141)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
55% (108/196)
56% (74/133)
Deciding Set Win %
58% (104/180)
86% (232/199)
1st Set Won, Won Match
90% (408/367)
14% (232/33)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
9% (408/38)
24% (187/45)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
26% (232/61)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
