Chris Woodruff vs John Van Lottum Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Woodruff vs Lottum analysis and find out who is favored!
Chris Woodruff vs John Van Lottum Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Woodruff has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lottum has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Woodruff, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lottum has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Woodruff has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lottum has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Woodruff has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lottum winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Woodruff has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 65/ 55), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 19/ 23). Lottum has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Woodruff has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lottum has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Woodruff has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lottum has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Woodruff has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lottum has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Woodruff 0 - 0 Lottum
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
51
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
47
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Chris Woodruff | John Van Lottum |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Chris Woodruff Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | |||
SF | 6-7(7) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H |
view more
John Van Lottum Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Wayne Arthurs
Player
John van Lottum
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
15
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
John van Lottum
Player
Ricardo Mello
56%
(
69 of
123)
1st Serve %
69%
(
92 of
133)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
61 of
92)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
51 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
56 of
133)
128
Total Points Won
128
|
3-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Radek Stepanek
Player
John van Lottum
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
John van Lottum
Player
Lars Uebel
49%
(
37 of
76)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
John van Lottum
Player
Jean-Rene Lisnard
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more