M. Lajal
To Win
C. Rodesch
To Win
Chris Rodesch vs Emilio Nava Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L L W L W
Form
L W W L W L W W L WHead-2-Head: Rodesch 1 - 1 Nava
They have played 5 sets in total, with Rodesch winning 2 and Nava winning 3. The last match between Rodesch and Nava was at the Tallahassee Challenger, 20-04-2025, Round: Final, Surface: Clay, with Chris Rodesch getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chris Rodesch | 1 |
| Emilio Nava | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Tallahassee Challenger(20-04-2025)
Chris Rodesch
Emilio Nava
4
6
6
3
6
4
| Rodesch | Stats | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| 66% (29-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (39-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 163 | Ranking | 119 |
| 163 | Highest Rank | 119 |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 6 |
| 71% (115-47) | Career Total W/L | 60% (227-154) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $559,385 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
Upcoming Match
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bogdan VS Makarova PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Quinn VS Griekspoor PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
24 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Chris Rodesch
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Chris Rodesch
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 24 | Games Won | 25 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:48:49 | Average Match Time | 1:48:49 |
| 69% (102/148) | 1st Serve % | 56% (86/153) |
| 67% (68/102) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (62/86) |
| 54% (25/46) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (37/67) |
| 31% (5/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 55% (6/11) |
| 35% (54/153) | Return Points Win % | 37% (55/148) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rodesch vs Nava Match Preview :
In terms of recent performance on second serve points, Rodesch has secured 46.24% of points in the past six months, while Nava has achieved a slightly higher rate of 46.82%. This comparison provides an insight into the potential outcome of their match, given the high correlation of this statistic with match prediction accuracy.
When examining their return games during the same period, Rodesch has prevailed on 45.84% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Nava leads marginally with 46.98%. On first serve returns, Rodesch has a success rate of 25.88%, compared to Nava's 24.95%, influencing the expectations for the head-to-head matchup.
Consideration of how players handle pressure is crucial, and Rodesch shows an advantage here, saving 54.84% of breakpoints, compared to Nava's 52.55%. Over the past year, Rodesch has been in superb form, winning 78.05% of matches (64 out of 82), while Nava has won 59.76% of his encounters (49 out of 82), highlighting a clear performance disparity that could influence predictions.
Focusing on surface preferences, Rodesch has excelled on hard courts, boasting an impressive 83% win rate (38 out of 46 matches), but has underperformed on indoor hard surfaces. In contrast, Nava's best performances have been on clay with a 69% win rate, although he struggles on grass.
Direct head-to-head confrontations reveal that Rodesch and Nava have faced off once, with Nava emerging victorious. The match's duration averaged 83 minutes, emphasizing the intensity and competitive nature. While no deciding sets or tiebreaks have been played between them, comparing their overall records shows Rodesch excelling in deciding sets with a 79% win rate compared to Nava’s 52%.
Analyzing the quality of opponents over the past year, Rodesch has encountered players with an average ranking of 394.5, while Nava has faced relatively stronger competition with opponents averaging a ranking of 257.74. In terms of event-level experience, Rodesch has excelled in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, with a win rate of 89.36%, whereas Nava has been more active on the Challengers/ITF >$10K circuit with a 67.61% success rate.
Recent form in conversion of breakpoints reveals Rodesch's 30.37% success compared to Nava's superior 38.59%, an essential factor for live betting enthusiasts. Considering all available data, Nava is slightly favored to win, backed by his superior performance metrics across various dimensions.
Rodesch vs Nava Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Chris Rodesch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Matteo Gigante
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Chris Rodesch
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
46 of
62)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
76%
(
82 of
108)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
102)
19
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
60 of
82)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
46 of
58)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
35 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
32 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Chris Rodesch
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Chris Rodesch
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Facundo Mena
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Martin Klizan
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Mathys Erhard
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
82%
(
45 of
55)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mitchell Krueger
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
21
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(6) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Colton Smith
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
69 of
107)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
46 of
59)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Ryan Peniston
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jack Pinnington Jones
71%
(
79 of
112)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
121)
26
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
11
84%
(
66 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
54 of
73)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
28%
(
31 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
44 of
121)
125
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 6-7(10) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Emilio Nava
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Andrej Martin
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
7
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71% (115/47) | Win/Loss | 60% (227/154) |
| 66% (246/126) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (505/391) |
| 55% (1989/1604) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4543/4221) |
| 83% (38/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (89/73) |
| 73% (58/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (105/52) |
| 53% (17/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (28/23) |
| 50% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.53 |
| 727 | Aces Total | 2268 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 439 | Total Double Faults | 1078 |
| 1:33:33 | Average Match Time | 1:36:58 |
| 399.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 370.08 |
| 68% (6862/10108) | 1st Serve % | 63% (16539/26394) |
| 71% (4848/6862) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (11745/16539) |
| 52% (1676/3246) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5063/9855) |
| 41% (438/1079) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (976/2335) |
| 41% (4151/10234) | Return Points Win % | 38% (9994/26454) |
| 50% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 56% (14/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 40% (8/12) |
| 50% (4/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 41% (9/13) |
| 58% (30/22) | Challenger W/L | 62% (148/92) |
| 80% (80/20) | Futures W/L | 65% (48/26) |
| 71% (115/161) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (221/370) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 44% (4/9) |
| 53% (31/58) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (80/165) |
| 67% (33/49) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (75/124) |
| 92% (108/99) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (213/184) |
| 8% (108/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (213/29) |
| 30% (54/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (168/42) |
Rodesch vs. Nava Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
