Chloe Paquet vs Celine Naef Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L L L L L L
Form
L W W W W W L W W LH2H: Paquet 1 - 1 Naef
They have played 5 sets in total, with Paquet winning 3 and Naef winning 2. The last match between Paquet and Naef was at the Wimbledon - London, 24-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Celine Naef getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chloe Paquet | 1 |
| Celine Naef | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(24-06-2025)
Celine Naef
Chloe Paquet
6
4
4
6
6
4
| Paquet | Stats | Naef |
|---|---|---|
| 37% (14-24) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (17-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 151 | Ranking | 178 |
| 96 | Highest Rank | 121 |
| 31 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 7 |
| 51% (424-410) | Career Total W/L | 65% (126-69) |
| $442,085 | Career Prize Money | $220,512 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cobolli VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 4-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Celine Naef
Player
Chloe Paquet
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
45%
(
47 of
104)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
11
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Celine Naef
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 26 | Games Won | 23 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 16 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:2:34 | Average Match Time | 2:2:34 |
| 48% (78/161) | 1st Serve % | 65% (108/166) |
| 71% (55/78) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (63/108) |
| 45% (37/83) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (27/58) |
| 42% (10/24) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (8/21) |
| 46% (76/166) | Return Points Win % | 43% (69/161) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Paquet vs Naef Match Preview :
- On second serve points, Naef has a slight edge, winning 41.48% compared to Paquet's 40.96% in recent months. Is this advantage significant? Marginally.
- When returning, Paquet demonstrates stronger performance, winning 51.91% of points against opponents' second serves, surpassing Naef's 45.29%.
- For first serve returns, Paquet again outperforms Naef with a win percentage of 34.28% compared to Naef's 29.04%.
- Both players show similar capability under pressure, with Paquet saving 51.12% of breakpoints and Naef at 51.19%.
- Considering overall performance, Naef has won a higher percentage of matches over the past year, 62.07%, compared to Paquet's 42.19%.
- Regarding playing surfaces, Paquet excels on clay, whereas Naef shows better results on indoor hard courts.
- Both players have recently participated primarily in Challengers/ITF tournaments, with Naef holding a higher win rate of 66.67% compared to Paquet's 54.05%.
- Paquet leads the direct head-to-head, having won their only previous encounter on clay.
- Naef plays against less competitive opponents, with an average opponent ranking of 237.78, whereas Paquet faces higher-ranked opponents, averaging 168.2.
- Naef is much stronger in deciding sets overall, winning 67% compared to Paquet's 38%.
- In converting break points recently, Naef is slightly better, achieving a 37.84% conversion rate versus Paquet's 35.79%.
Editorial Prediction (June 24, 2025, UTC):
As the two players prepare to face off, the statistical comparison reveals certain strengths and weaknesses on both sides. Paquet appears to have the upper hand when it comes to returning serves, successfully navigating her opponents' service games with greater ease than Naef.
On the other hand, Naef showcases a slightly better performance in second serve points and holds a commendable track record in deciding sets, which could be pivotal if the match turns tight.
Historically, Paquet has claimed victory in their only previous encounter, which took place on her preferred surface, giving her a psychological advantage. However, Naef's superior overall performance statistics and proficiency in critical match moments cannot be overlooked.
Ultimately, with Naef's higher win rate, especially in deciding moments and recent successes, she appears to be the more likely winner in this matchup.
Paquet vs Naef Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Chloe Paquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Chloe Paquet
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Chloe Paquet
61%
(
67 of
110)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
91%
(
10 of
11)
Break Points Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
53%
(
58 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
56 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Chloe Paquet
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
45%
(
47 of
104)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
11
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajla Tomljanovic
Player
Chloe Paquet
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
79
|
0-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Chloe Paquet
73%
(
65 of
89)
1st Serve %
46%
(
52 of
112)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
14
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
89%
(
8 of
9)
51%
(
45 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
57 of
112)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tereza Valentova
Player
Chloe Paquet
62%
(
73 of
117)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
49 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Chloe Paquet
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
3
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
7
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
77%
(
63 of
82)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Celine Naef
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Mariam Bolkvadze
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Chloe Paquet
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
45%
(
47 of
104)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
11
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Rebecca Marino
Player
Celine Naef
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
19%
(
4 of
21)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Amarni Banks
49%
(
49 of
100)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
6
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
8
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Antonia Ruzic
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
75
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Kyoka Okamura
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Kayla Cross
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
8
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (424/410) | Win/Loss | 65% (126/69) |
| 52% (999/939) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (280/178) |
| 51% (9094/8723) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2308/1900) |
| 48% (96/104) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (16/10) |
| 53% (248/220) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (26/23) |
| 50% (74/75) | Indoor Hard W/L | 72% (71/27) |
| 35% (6/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 59% (13/9) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 2003 | Aces Total | 583 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 2846 | Total Double Faults | 440 |
| 1:13:30 | Average Match Time | 1:36:38 |
| 472.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 303.59 |
| 59% (24621/41502) | 1st Serve % | 60% (8026/13437) |
| 64% (15769/24621) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (5185/8026) |
| 44% (7466/16881) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2641/5411) |
| 45% (2240/4937) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (842/1686) |
| 44% (18663/42077) | Return Points Win % | 46% (6184/13471) |
| 29% (12/29) | Slam W/L | 44% (8/10) |
| 17% (2/10) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 41% (42/61) | Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 54% (273/236) | Challenger W/L | 68% (101/47) |
| 56% (95/74) | Futures W/L | 87% (13/2) |
| 51% (419/822) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (126/195) |
| 33% (2/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (89/179) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (21/38) |
| 44% (119/270) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (40/68) |
| 80% (450/361) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (117/102) |
| 20% (450/88) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (117/15) |
| 16% (384/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 31% (78/24) |
Paquet vs. Naef Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
