Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chloe Paquet vs Barbara Gatica Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paquet vs Gatica analysis and find out who is favored!
Chloe Paquet vs Barbara Gatica Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paquet has won 45.68% of points on his second serve, while Gatica has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paquet, in recent form, has won 55.52% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gatica has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.97% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paquet has saved 52.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gatica has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paquet has won 52.05% of matches played (W/L 38/ 35), with Gatica winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paquet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 220/ 192), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7). Gatica has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 220/ 137), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Paquet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.7% of matches (W/L 29/ 25), where as Gatica has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paquet winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Paquet winning 2 and Gatica winning 0. The last match between Paquet and Gatica was at the W60 Grodzisk Mazowiecki, 31-07-2021, Semifinals, Clay with Chloe Paquet getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paquet and Gatica have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paquet winning 0 times and Gatica 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paquet winning 0, and Gatica 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paquet has played against opponents with an average rank of 257.73 while Gatica has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paquet has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gatica has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paquet has converted 41.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gatica has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paquet 1 - 0 Gatica
149
Rank
101
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
603
Rank
201
High
27
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
52% (389-363)
Career Total W/L
61% (267-174)
48% (10-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$218,175
Career Prize Money
$1,950
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Chloe Paquet | Barbara Gatica |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:0 | 1:39:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (37/56) | 78% (49/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (23/37) | 47% (23/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (6/19) | 21% (3/14) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 57% (4/7) |
| Return Points W% | 59% (37/63) | 48% (27/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Chloe Paquet
Player
Barbara Gatica
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
78%
(
49 of
63)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
27 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chloe Paquet | Barbara Gatica |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (10/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (23/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (216/208) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 38 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.43 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 88 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:49 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 285.57 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (807/1370) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (501/807) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (255/563) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (85/222) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (700/1514) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (10/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Chloe Paquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Chloe Paquet
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Andreea Mitu
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
108)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Chloe Paquet
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
82%
(
46 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Nikola Bartunkova
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
12
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
52%
(
50 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Jessica Bertoldo
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Chloe Paquet
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
83)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
16
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Chloe Paquet
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Barbara Gatica Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Barbara Gatica
79%
(
69 of
87)
1st Serve %
76%
(
59 of
78)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
49%
(
34 of
69)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
53%
(
10 of
19)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
51%
(
44 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Barbara Gatica
Player
Sapfo Sakellaridi
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
50%
(
39 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Barbara Gatica
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Barbara Gatica
Player
Darya Astakhova
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Barbara Gatica
Player
Irina Khromacheva
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Barbara Gatica
Player
Angelica Raggi
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
42%
(
26 of
62)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Barbara Gatica
Player
Camilla Rosatello
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andreea Prisacariu
Player
Barbara Gatica
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 2-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Barbara Gatica
Player
Celia Cervino Ruiz
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
36 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 2-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Barbara Gatica
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve %
80%
(
63 of
79)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
21%
(
3 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
54%
(
37 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Paquet Vs Gatica Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Chloe Paquet
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
