C. Paquet
To Win
K. Birrell
To Win
Chloe Paquet vs Alina Charaeva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L W L L
Form
W W L W W L L W W LHead-To-Head: Paquet 1 - 0 Charaeva
They have played 2 sets in total, with Paquet winning 2 and Charaeva winning 0. The last match between Paquet and Charaeva was at the W100 Madrid, 18-04-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Chloe Paquet getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chloe Paquet | 1 |
| Alina Charaeva | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W100 Madrid(18-04-2025)
6
3
6
4
| Paquet | Stats | Charaeva |
|---|---|---|
| 37% (10-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (12-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 138 | Ranking | 253 |
| 96 | Highest Rank | 197 |
| 30 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 7 |
| 51% (420-403) | Career Total W/L | 64% (162-91) |
| $442,085 | Career Prize Money | $5,000 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
13 May 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
12 May 2025 / Q3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fils VS Zverev PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
13 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Giron VS Hurkacz PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
11 May 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Chloe Paquet
Player
Alina Charaeva
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:44:19 | Average Match Time | 1:44:19 |
| 60% (33/55) | 1st Serve % | 63% (45/72) |
| 64% (21/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (25/45) |
| 50% (11/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (9/27) |
| 38% (6/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 53% (38/72) | Return Points Win % | 42% (23/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Paquet vs Charaeva Match Preview :
In the realm of second serve antics, Charaeva has been doing moderately ok, winning 36.1% of points in the last six months, while Paquet struts a tad ahead with 40.83%. If statistics were fortune tellers, they'd likely suggest that this could influence the outcome. Secondly, when it comes to snatching opponent’s serve points, Charaeva's eagle eyes have captured a splendid 50.35% of second serves, compared to Paquet's close but slightly lagging 50.08% on second serve returns. In the kingdom of the first serve returns, Charaeva reigns supreme with 36.19% while Paquet is like a loyal jester trailing at 32.43%. It's like they say, "Return better, conquer greater!"
When storms of breakpoints brew, Charaeva saves 45.71% valiantly, while Paquet saves them with a prince-worthy 50.21%. Clutch under pressure much? Now, speaking royal win percentages over the past year, Charaeva has claimed victory in 59.42% of matches (W/L 41/28), laughing at Paquet’s 44.78% (W/L 30/37). Alas, who would've guessed we’d use math to declare favorites in this dramatic tale? Now, when it comes to career surfaces, Charaeva’s realm of glory lies on Hard courts at 67% (W/L 71/35), although Indoor Hard has managed to escape her full control with just 59% triumph. Meanwhile, Paquet feels like the clay king, boasting a noble 53% win rate (W/L 242/211), but when it comes to Grass, it's clear she really just wants to stay indoors with win rate diminishing to 40% (W/L 6/9).
Over the past year, these two tennis warriors have embarked on numerous battles at the Challengers/ITF level, reaping a 59.42% win rate for Charaeva (W/L 41/28) and a courteous 51.28% for Paquet (W/L 20/19). Remember folks, it’s not just about bragging rights; it's about the level they've been playing at. As for opponent quality, while navigating this chaotic sport, Charaeva duels with foes ranked 362.25 on average, while Paquet faces off against competitors at a punchy average rank of 191.94. If they end up neck and neck in a deciding set, Charaeva's 57% success proves her stamina shines compared to Paquet’s 46%.
And let’s not forget their current event showings, as these reveal who's looking in tip-top form. Why should breakpoints be any less exciting? Charaeva has been seizing 41.77% of her chances, while Paquet bunts at 32.53%. It's almost tempting to pull out the crystal ball and predict Charaeva's victory in this statistical saga! Watch out, tennis world – Charaeva's on the rise. Based on these stats, Charaeva might just be poised for glory!
Chloe Paquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Chloe Paquet
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Chloe Paquet
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
45 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Chloe Paquet
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Chloe Paquet
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
55
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Alina Charaeva
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Aliona Bolsova
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
83%
(
48 of
58)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Veronika Podrez
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
81%
(
85 of
105)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
48 of
85)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Chloe Paquet
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
77 of
117)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
117)
101
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Alina Charaeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Alina Charaeva
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
8
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Marina Bassols Ribera
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Nina Stojanovic
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diana Martynov
Player
Alina Charaeva
79%
(
89 of
112)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
102)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
51%
(
45 of
89)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
53%
(
59 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
102)
108
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Alina Charaeva
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Eva Vedder
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Cristina Diaz Adrover
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
79%
(
52 of
66)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Alina Charaeva
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Mayar Sherif
55%
(
77 of
140)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
48%
(
30 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
48%
(
67 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
115
Total Points Won
122
|
4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
47%
(
45 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (420/403) | Win/Loss | 64% (162/91) |
| 52% (986/923) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (346/221) |
| 51% (8954/8581) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2830/2314) |
| 48% (96/104) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (71/35) |
| 53% (244/215) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (61/35) |
| 50% (74/75) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (30/21) |
| 40% (6/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1943 | Aces Total | 411 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.47 |
| 2771 | Total Double Faults | 1172 |
| 1:12:47 | Average Match Time | 1:42:30 |
| 470.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 438.56 |
| 59% (24119/40611) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9675/15837) |
| 64% (15439/24119) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (6014/9675) |
| 44% (7301/16492) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2637/6162) |
| 45% (2184/4822) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1138/2241) |
| 44% (18229/41120) | Return Points Win % | 49% (7872/16078) |
| 31% (12/27) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 17% (2/10) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (42/60) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 54% (269/232) | Challenger W/L | 62% (126/76) |
| 56% (95/74) | Futures W/L | 71% (35/14) |
| 51% (416/812) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (155/244) |
| 33% (2/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (89/177) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (26/53) |
| 45% (117/262) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (39/68) |
| 81% (443/358) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (154/139) |
| 19% (443/84) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (154/14) |
| 16% (380/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (99/22) |
Paquet vs. Charaeva Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
