Prediction of Chihiro Muramatsu [535th] vs Elena Micic [354th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L L W L
Form
L L L W W L W W W LHead To Head: Muramatsu 2 - 0 Micic
They have played 6 sets in total, with Muramatsu winning 4 and Micic winning 2. The last match between Muramatsu and Micic was at the W35 Mildura, 14-03-2025, Quarterfinals, Grass with Chihiro Muramatsu getting the victory 5-7 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chihiro Muramatsu | 2 |
| Elena Micic | 0 |
| Muramatsu | Stats | Micic |
|---|---|---|
| 65% (13-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (7-8) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 535 | Ranking | 354 |
| 205 | Highest Rank | 354 |
| 26 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (270-215) | Career Total W/L | 50% (73-72) |
| $95,167 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Elena Micic
74%
(
89 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
12
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
53 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
117
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
| 0-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Elena Micic
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
78%
(
63 of
81)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 30 | Games Won | 27 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 2:43:44 | Average Match Time | 2:43:44 |
| 70% (140/200) | 1st Serve % | 71% (126/177) |
| 62% (87/140) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (74/126) |
| 45% (27/60) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (22/51) |
| 39% (11/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (9/22) |
| 46% (81/177) | Return Points Win % | 43% (86/200) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chihiro Muramatsu vs Elena Micic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Muramatsu 2 - 0 Micic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Muramatsu has won 39.15% of points on their second serve, while Micic has won 41.93%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Muramatsu, in recent form, has won 52.01% of their opponent's second serve points, while Micic has won 49.74%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.71% and 32.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Muramatsu has saved 48.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Micic has saved 49.07% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Muramatsu has won 59.38% of matches played (W/L 38/ 26), with Micic winning 62.3% (W/L 38/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Muramatsu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 200/ 144), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5). Micic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 6/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 18% (W/L 4/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Muramatsu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.38% of matches (W/L 32/ 21), where as Micic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.26% of matches (W/L 33/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Muramatsu winning 2 times and Micic being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Muramatsu winning 4 and Micic winning 2. The last match between Muramatsu and Micic was at the W35 Mildura, 14-03-2025, Quarterfinals, Grass with Chihiro Muramatsu getting the victory 5-7 7-5 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:43:44.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Muramatsu and Micic have played a deciding set 2 times, with Muramatsu winning 2 times and Micic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Muramatsu winning 0, and Micic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Muramatsu has played against opponents with an average rank of 325.11 while Micic has played against players with an average rank of 231.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Muramatsu has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Micic has won 79% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Muramatsu has converted 39.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Micic has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Chihiro Muramatsu vs Elena Micic Best Odds For The Match
Chihiro Muramatsu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa-Marie Rioux
Player
Chihiro Muramatsu
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lizette Cabrera
Player
Chihiro Muramatsu
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
79%
(
38 of
48)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Arina Varaksina
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Amelia Zylberman
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
100%
(
10 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lizette Cabrera
Player
Chihiro Muramatsu
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Laquisa Khan
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Elena Micic
74%
(
89 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
12
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
53 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
117
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Jelena Cvijanovic
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Elena Micic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Elena Micic
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
71%
(
69 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
11
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Belle Thompson
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Carolann Delaunay
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Elena Micic
74%
(
89 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
12
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
53 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
117
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Belle Thompson
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Larisa Arnautovic
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lizette Cabrera
Player
Elena Micic
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Elena Micic
63%
(
64 of
101)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taylah Preston
Player
Elena Micic
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Muramatsu vs Micic?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Muramatsu Vs Micic is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (270/215) | Win/Loss | 50% (73/72) |
| 55% (602/498) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (163/165) |
| 52% (5132/4737) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1486/1470) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 128 | Aces Total | 248 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.46 |
| 765 | Total Double Faults | 670 |
| 1:37:25 | Average Match Time | 1:23:48 |
| 502.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 370.7 |
| 72% (19627/27196) | 1st Serve % | 65% (5456/8356) |
| 56% (11081/19627) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (3248/5456) |
| 46% (3473/7568) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1237/2900) |
| 48% (1765/3708) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (485/1026) |
| 47% (13044/27856) | Return Points Win % | 45% (3770/8302) |
| 55% (264/479) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (72/144) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 52% (41/79) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (11/18) |
| 50% (65/130) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (20/37) |
| 88% (261/229) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (70/60) |
| 12% (261/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (70/10) |
| 18% (224/41) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (75/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
