Chieh-Yu Hsu vs Vivien Sandberg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hsu vs Sandberg analysis and find out who is favored!
Chieh-Yu Hsu vs Vivien Sandberg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hsu has won 44.63% of points on his second serve, while Sandberg has won 49.55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hsu, in recent form, has won 54.86% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sandberg has won 58.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.8% and 37.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hsu has saved 53.28% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sandberg has saved 44.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hsu has won 45.95% of matches played (W/L 17/ 20), with Sandberg winning 38.46% (W/L 10/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hsu has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 26/ 21), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Sandberg has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 29/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Hsu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 10/ 15), where as Sandberg has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.48% of matches (W/L 10/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hsu winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hsu winning 2 and Sandberg winning 0. The last match between Hsu and Sandberg was at the W15 Cancun, 23-11-2021, First, Hard with Chieh-Yu Hsu getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hsu and Sandberg have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hsu winning 0 times and Sandberg 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hsu winning 0, and Sandberg 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hsu has played against opponents with an average rank of 152.51 while Sandberg has played against players with an average rank of 10.85.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hsu has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sandberg has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hsu has converted 44.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sandberg has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hsu 1 - 0 Sandberg
6
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
756
Rank
224
High
32
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
50% (364-368)
Career Total W/L
34% (31-59)
42% (5-7)
YTD W/L
33% (3-6)
$6,405
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Chieh-Yu Hsu | Vivien Sandberg |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:7:0 | 1:7:0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (29/45) | 69% (29/42) |
1st Serve Win% | 76% (22/29) | 52% (15/29) |
2nd Serve Win% | 75% (12/16) | 38% (5/13) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 52% (22/42) | 24% (11/45) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-3 |
Chieh-Yu Hsu
Player
Vivien Sandberg
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Chieh-Yu Hsu | Vivien Sandberg |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 42% (5/7) | 33% (3/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 48% (13/14) | 36% (8/14) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (125/115) | 44% (101/127) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 33% (3/6) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.08 | 0 |
Aces Total | 9 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.07 |
DFs Total | 16 | 8 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 185.67 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (304/520) | 53% (58/110) |
1st Serve W% | 54% (165/304) | 41% (24/58) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (104/216) | 44% (23/52) |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (25/50) | 38% (5/13) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (197/450) | 44% (50/114) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (5/12) | 33% (3/9) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/3) | 50% (2/4) |
1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 60% (5/3) |
1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 40% (5/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Chieh-Yu Hsu Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 4-6 6-0 10-8 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Ariana Anazagasty-Pursoo
Player
Chieh-Yu Hsu
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
2
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
2
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
92
Total Points Won
100
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Panna Bartha
Player
Chieh-Yu Hsu
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
16 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Chieh-Yu Hsu
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Chieh-Yu Hsu
Player
Alana Smith
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Chieh-Yu Hsu
Player
Autumn Clemons
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
44%
(
14 of
32)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
52%
(
16 of
31)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
86%
(
18 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sophie Chang
Player
Chieh-Yu Hsu
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mayuka Aikawa
Player
Chieh-Yu Hsu
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Vivien Sandberg Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Karolina Mrazikova
Player
Vivien Sandberg
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 2-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Jade Psonka
Player
Vivien Sandberg
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
48%
(
31 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-0 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 4-6 14-12 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Carmen Andreea Herea
Player
Vivien Sandberg
45%
(
30 of
66)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
48 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more