Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chiara Scholl vs Chayenne Ewijk Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Scholl vs Ewijk analysis and find out who is favored!
Chiara Scholl vs Chayenne Ewijk Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Scholl has won 42.27% of points on his second serve, while Ewijk has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Scholl, in recent form, has won 56.34% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ewijk has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.33% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Scholl has saved 42.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ewijk has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Scholl has won 45.24% of matches played (W/L 19/ 23), with Ewijk winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Scholl has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 292/ 218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Ewijk has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 110/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 14/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Scholl has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.11% of matches (W/L 16/ 22), where as Ewijk has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Scholl winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Scholl winning 2 and Ewijk winning 1. The last match between Scholl and Ewijk was at the Schoonhoven, 03-09-2016, Semifinals, Clay with Chiara Scholl getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Scholl and Ewijk have played a deciding set 1 times, with Scholl winning 1 times and Ewijk 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Scholl winning 0, and Ewijk 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Scholl has played against opponents with an average rank of 267.62 while Ewijk has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Scholl has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ewijk has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Scholl has converted 56.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ewijk has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Scholl 1 - 0 Ewijk
574
Rank
164
High
31
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
229
High
35
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
55% (435-358)
Career Total W/L
64% (183-102)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$18,348
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Chiara Scholl | Chayenne Ewijk |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:41:0 | 2:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 48% (44/92) | 60% (70/116) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (31/44) | 53% (37/70) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (19/48) | 48% (22/46) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (7/16) | 43% (6/14) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (57/116) | 46% (42/92) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Chiara Scholl
Player
Chayenne Ewijk
48%
(
44 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
116)
0
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
9
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
40%
(
19 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
57 of
116)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chiara Scholl | Chayenne Ewijk |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Chiara Scholl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nadine Keller
Player
Chiara Scholl
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Chiara Scholl
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
12
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastianna Scilipoti
Player
Chiara Scholl
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
12 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
44
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 1-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chiara Scholl
Player
Raquel Ducet Teixeira
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Chiara Scholl
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Chiara Scholl
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve %
50%
(
13 of
26)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
11 of
14)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
34
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Stusek
Player
Chiara Scholl
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chiara Scholl
Player
Luisina Giovannini
53%
(
56 of
105)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
44 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Kan
Player
Chiara Scholl
41%
(
31 of
76)
1st Serve %
47%
(
47 of
99)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
11
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chiara Scholl
Player
Anna Klasen
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Chayenne Ewijk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Sviatlana Pirazhenka
Player
Chayenne Ewijk
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
10
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chayenne Ewijk
Player
Eleonora Molinaro
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chayenne Ewijk
Player
Xenia Knoll
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chayenne Ewijk
Player
Deborah Kerfs
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
49%
(
48 of
98)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
7
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
98)
114
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chayenne Ewijk
Player
Cindy Castille
49%
(
48 of
98)
1st Serve %
52%
(
55 of
105)
9
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
10
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Meritxell Perera Ros
Player
Chayenne Ewijk
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
12
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
29 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chayenne Ewijk
Player
Ioana Gheorghita
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marina Melnikova
Player
Chayenne Ewijk
70%
(
69 of
98)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chayenne Ewijk
Player
Dalila Spiteri
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
88%
(
38 of
43)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chayenne Ewijk
Player
Deborah Kerfs
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Scholl Vs Ewijk Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
