Cheong-Eui Kim vs Zura Tkemaladze Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kim vs Tkemaladze analysis and find out who is favored!
Cheong-Eui Kim vs Zura Tkemaladze Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kim has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Tkemaladze has won 49.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kim, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tkemaladze has won 55.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.49% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kim has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tkemaladze has saved 53.04% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kim has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Tkemaladze winning 52.86% (W/L 37/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 73/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 8/ 6). Tkemaladze has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 70/ 62), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kim winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kim winning 2 and Tkemaladze winning 1. The last match between Kim and Tkemaladze was at the M15 Antalya, 02-05-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Cheong-Eui Kim getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kim and Tkemaladze have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kim winning 1 times and Tkemaladze 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kim winning 0, and Tkemaladze 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kim has played against opponents with an average rank of while Tkemaladze has played against players with an average rank of 102.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kim has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tkemaladze has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kim has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tkemaladze has converted 39.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kim 1 - 0 Tkemaladze
13
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
13
Minor
829
Rank
296
High
34
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
712
Rank
633
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
57% (375-279)
Career Total W/L
47% (100-115)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
38% (5-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kim VS Tkemaladze H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Cheong-Eui Kim | Zura Tkemaladze |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 27 | 24 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Kim VS Tkemaladze H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(6) 7-5 14-12 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Cheong-Eui Kim | Zura Tkemaladze |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 42% (13/18) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (123/158) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.05 |
Aces Total | 0 | 7 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.19 |
DFs Total | 0 | 26 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:38:41 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 50 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 69% (550/793) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (319/550) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (114/243) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 40% (34/86) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (312/783) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/13) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (6/5) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (7/0) |
Cheong-Eui Kim Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
31%
(
15 of
48)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Steve Johnson
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Robert Galloway
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
F | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
SF |
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Duckhee Lee
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
80%
(
48 of
60)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Yuta Kawahashi
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Hyeondeok Yoon
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
F | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
SF |
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
50%
(
49 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Zura Tkemaladze Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
74%
(
68 of
92)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Edas Butvilas
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Seydina Andre
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Aurel Ciocanu
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
49%
(
25 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicolas Ifi
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
13
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(2) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tomasz Berkieta
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Ben Jones
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
1
Aces
17
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
14
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Patrick Zahraj
76%
(
69 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more