Cheong-Eui Kim vs Zsombor Piros Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kim vs Piros analysis and find out who is favored!
Cheong-Eui Kim vs Zsombor Piros Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kim has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Piros has won 51.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kim, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Piros has won 48.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kim has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Piros has saved 61.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kim has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Piros winning 62.82% (W/L 49/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 73/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 8/ 6). Piros has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 70% (W/L 7/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 41/ 36).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kim winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kim winning 0 and Piros winning 2. The last match between Kim and Piros was at the Shenzhen Challenger, 27-10-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Zsombor Piros getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:52.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kim and Piros have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kim winning 0 times and Piros 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kim winning 0, and Piros 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kim has played against opponents with an average rank of while Piros has played against players with an average rank of 331.37.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kim has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Piros has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kim has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Piros has converted 40.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kim 0 - 1 Piros
13
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
13
Minor
829
Rank
296
High
34
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
108
Rank
106
High
24
Age
R
Plays
10
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
57% (375-279)
Career Total W/L
63% (250-145)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
58% (11-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$119,810
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Cheong-Eui Kim | Zsombor Piros |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 4 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 6 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:3:52 | 1:3:52 |
1st Serve % | 69% (37/54) | 72% (34/47) |
1st Serve Win% | 62% (23/37) | 74% (25/34) |
2nd Serve Win% | 29% (5/17) | 85% (11/13) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 40% (4/10) |
Return Points W% | 23% (11/47) | 48% (26/54) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-3 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Cheong-Eui Kim | Zsombor Piros |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 59% (27/19) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (235/207) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.28 |
Aces Total | 0 | 60 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 0 | 43 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:36:35 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 374.37 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (825/1326) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (560/825) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (258/501) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 41% (63/155) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (543/1341) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/6) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/19) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/8) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 71% (14/10) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (14/4) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
Cheong-Eui Kim Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
31%
(
15 of
48)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Steve Johnson
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Robert Galloway
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
F | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
SF |
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Duckhee Lee
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
80%
(
48 of
60)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Yuta Kawahashi
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Hyeondeok Yoon
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
F | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
SF |
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
50%
(
49 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Zsombor Piros Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Francesco Passaro
Player
Zsombor Piros
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
12
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Zsombor Piros
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
90
|
0-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Titouan Droguet
Player
Zsombor Piros
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Giovanni Fonio
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Zsombor Piros
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
2
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
0
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jules Marie
Player
Zsombor Piros
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Matteo Martineau
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Quentin Halys
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
2
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
13 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H |
view more