Cheong-Eui Kim vs Luke Saville Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Head-To-Head
1 - 0
57% (375-279)
Career Total W/L
55% (369-304)
0% (0-0)
Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$210,430
0
YTD Titles
0
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Luke Saville
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| stats | Cheong-Eui Kim | Luke Saville |
|---|---|---|
| H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 5 |
| Total Double Faults | 1 | 3 |
| Average Match Time | 1:35:9 | 1:35:9 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (45/66) | 55% (36/65) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 73% (33/45) | 53% (19/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (9/21) | 59% (17/29) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points Win % | 45% (29/65) | 36% (24/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cheong-Eui Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
31%
(
15 of
48)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robert Galloway
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Duckhee Lee
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
80%
(
48 of
60)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Yuta Kawahashi
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Hyeondeok Yoon
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
50%
(
49 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Luke Saville Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Luke Saville
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
76%
(
22 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
16 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Luke Saville
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Joshua Sheehy
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
89)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Luke Saville
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Luke Saville
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Luke Saville
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
20
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Zheng
Player
Luke Saville
46%
(
22 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Harrison Adams
Player
Luke Saville
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
86)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Dan Martin
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
100%
(
20 of
20)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Luke Saville
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cheong-Eui Kim | Luke Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Win/Loss | 57% (375/279) | 55% (369/304) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (832/659) | 54% (834/723) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (7377/6566) | 51% (7568/7155) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (285/208) | 54% (260/218) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (73/53) | 42% (16/22) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (17/18) | 51% (23/22) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (70/42) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.15 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 1048 | 2203 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 | 0.25 |
| Total Double Faults | 649 | 1814 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:11:2 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 525.7 | 563.16 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (14445/22253) | 60% (20920/34646) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9794/14445) | 70% (14651/20920) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3899/7808) | 50% (6893/13723) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1123/2510) | 41% (1255/3043) |
| Return Points Win % | 42% (9571/22577) | 38% (13068/34555) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 41% (12/17) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/6) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 33% (13/27) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 41% (57/82) | 48% (163/178) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (318/196) | 70% (179/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (363/642) | 55% (361/660) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) | 50% (5/10) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (75/163) | 51% (100/196) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 52% (98/189) | 53% (105/198) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (355/307) | 85% (372/315) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (355/47) | 15% (372/57) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (299/67) | 18% (301/54) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
