Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cheong-Eui Kim vs Lance-Pierre DU Toit Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kim vs Toit analysis and find out who is favored!
Cheong-Eui Kim vs Lance-Pierre DU Toit Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kim has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Toit has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kim, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Toit has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kim has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Toit has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kim has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Toit winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 73/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 8/ 6). Toit has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kim has played against opponents with an average rank of while Toit has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kim has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Toit has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kim has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Toit has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kim 0 - 0 Toit
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cheong-Eui Kim | Lance-Pierre DU Toit |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cheong-Eui Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Keegan Smith
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
31%
(
15 of
48)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robert Galloway
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Duckhee Lee
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
80%
(
48 of
60)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Yuta Kawahashi
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Hyeondeok Yoon
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
50%
(
49 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Lance-Pierre DU Toit Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Arsenije Zlatanovic
Player
Lance-Pierre Du Toit
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lance-Pierre Du Toit
Player
Gerhardt Marius Becker
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Hasson
Player
Lance-Pierre Du Toit
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
44%
(
45 of
103)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
11
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lance-Pierre Du Toit
Player
Muzingaye Dickson Andile Sibanda
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Lance-Pierre Du Toit
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lance-Pierre Du Toit
Player
Samuel Puskar
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
20 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruan Roelofse
Player
Lance-Pierre Du Toit
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
12 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lance-Pierre Du Toit
Player
Yan Sabanin
49%
(
35 of
71)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
61)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kim Vs Toit Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
