Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cheong-Eui Kim vs Connor Farren Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kim vs Farren analysis and find out who is favored!
Cheong-Eui Kim vs Connor Farren Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kim has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Farren has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kim, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Farren has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kim has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Farren has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kim has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Farren winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 73/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 8/ 6). Farren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 191/ 191), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kim winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kim winning 2 and Farren winning 0. The last match between Kim and Farren was at the Malaysia F1 (Kuala Lumpur), 04-07-2018, Quarterfinals, Hard with Cheong-Eui Kim getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kim and Farren have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kim winning 0 times and Farren 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kim winning 0, and Farren 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kim has played against opponents with an average rank of while Farren has played against players with an average rank of 164.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kim has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Farren has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kim has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Farren has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kim 1 - 0 Farren
829
Rank
296
High
34
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
894
Rank
685
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
57% (375-279)
Career Total W/L
48% (200-214)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Cheong-Eui Kim | Connor Farren |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (38/52) | 66% (29/44) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (27/38) | 62% (18/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (6/14) | 13% (2/15) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (24/44) | 37% (19/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Connor Farren
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cheong-Eui Kim | Connor Farren |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cheong-Eui Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
31%
(
15 of
48)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robert Galloway
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Duckhee Lee
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
80%
(
48 of
60)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Yuta Kawahashi
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Hyeondeok Yoon
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
50%
(
49 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Connor Farren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Connor Farren
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Connor Farren
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Alexander Kotzen
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Braden Shick
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaimee Floyd Angele
Player
Connor Farren
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Rudy Quan
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Connor Farren
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
13
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Ivar Aramburu Contreras
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Connor Farren
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
A.j. Catanzariti
Player
Connor Farren
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
4
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kim Vs Farren Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
