Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chelsea Fontenel vs Lauren Proctor Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fontenel vs Proctor analysis and find out who is favored!
Chelsea Fontenel vs Lauren Proctor Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fontenel has won 42.36% of points on his second serve, while Proctor has won 46.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fontenel, in recent form, has won 57.93% of his opponent's second serve points, while Proctor has won 49.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.23% and 39.09% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fontenel has saved 34.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Proctor has saved 58.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fontenel has won 43.48% of matches played (W/L 10/ 13), with Proctor winning 41.67% (W/L 10/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fontenel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5). Proctor has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 105/ 83), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Fontenel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.48% of matches (W/L 10/ 13), where as Proctor has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 30.77% of matches (W/L 4/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fontenel winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Fontenel winning 2 and Proctor winning 1. The last match between Fontenel and Proctor was at the W15 Cancun, 30-09-2021, Second, Hard with Chelsea Fontenel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fontenel and Proctor have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fontenel winning 1 times and Proctor 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fontenel winning 1, and Proctor 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fontenel has played against opponents with an average rank of 246.74 while Proctor has played against players with an average rank of 117.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fontenel has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Proctor has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fontenel has converted 36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Proctor has converted 44.23% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fontenel 1 - 0 Proctor
788
Rank
752
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
872
Rank
606
High
27
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
46% (26-30)
Career Total W/L
52% (122-113)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
40% (2-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Chelsea Fontenel | Lauren Proctor |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:57:0 | 2:57:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (71/103) | 51% (56/110) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (50/71) | 57% (32/56) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (13/32) | 50% (27/54) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (6/15) | 46% (6/13) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (51/110) | 39% (40/103) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats 
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Lauren Proctor
69%
(
71 of
103)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
110)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
9
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
110)
114
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chelsea Fontenel | Lauren Proctor |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (43/57) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 9 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:45:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 190.6 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 54% (180/333) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (105/180) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (68/153) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 50% (16/32) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (141/325) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
Chelsea Fontenel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Weronika Baszak
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
16 of
26)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Jokic
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
6-0 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Louise Kwong
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasmine Kabbaj
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
70%
(
64 of
92)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
1
Aces
4
13
Double Faults
4
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
48%
(
44 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Ellie Daniels
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(7) 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jade Otway
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexandra Vecic
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
81%
(
59 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Melany Solange Krywoj
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
51%
(
39 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lauren Proctor Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Whitney Osuigwe
Player
Lauren Proctor
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miriana Tona
Player
Lauren Proctor
87%
(
53 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
69)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Proctor
Player
Francesca Mattioli
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Lodikova
Player
Lauren Proctor
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Proctor
Player
Sol Ailin Larraya Guidi
47%
(
43 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Lauren Proctor
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Proctor
Player
Olivia Lincer
50%
(
40 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Lauren Proctor
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Fontenel Vs Proctor Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
