Chelsea Vanhoutte vs Vanessa Ersoz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vanhoutte vs Ersoz analysis and find out who is favored!
Chelsea Vanhoutte vs Vanessa Ersoz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vanhoutte has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ersoz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vanhoutte, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ersoz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vanhoutte has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ersoz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vanhoutte has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 14/ 7), with Ersoz winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vanhoutte has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 17/ 25). Ersoz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 43/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Vanhoutte has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 10/ 5), where as Ersoz has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vanhoutte winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Vanhoutte winning 2 and Ersoz winning 0. The last match between Vanhoutte and Ersoz was at the W15 Heraklion, 01-06-2022, First, Clay with Chelsea Vanhoutte getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vanhoutte and Ersoz have played a deciding set 0 times, with Vanhoutte winning 0 times and Ersoz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vanhoutte winning 0, and Ersoz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vanhoutte has played against opponents with an average rank of 101.71 while Ersoz has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vanhoutte has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ersoz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vanhoutte has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ersoz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vanhoutte 1 - 0 Ersoz
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
887
Rank
867
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
47% (114-128)
Career Total W/L
49% (46-48)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Chelsea Vanhoutte | Vanessa Ersoz |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:52:0 | 1:52:0 |
1st Serve % | 76% (56/74) | 53% (34/64) |
1st Serve Win% | 57% (32/56) | 56% (19/34) |
2nd Serve Win% | 33% (6/18) | 23% (7/30) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 78% (7/9) | 63% (5/8) |
Return Points W% | 59% (38/64) | 49% (36/74) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-4 |
Chelsea Vanhoutte
Player
Vanessa Ersoz
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Chelsea Vanhoutte | Vanessa Ersoz |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Chelsea Vanhoutte Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Viktoriia Dema
Player
Chelsea Vanhoutte
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
72%
(
60 of
83)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Chelsea Vanhoutte
Player
Alice Nicoleta Petrache
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
19 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Naima Karamoko
Player
Chelsea Vanhoutte
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
89%
(
39 of
44)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Chelsea Vanhoutte
Player
Mathilde Ngijol-Carre
82%
(
54 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
13
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Chelsea Vanhoutte
Player
Julie Myatovic
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marie Vogt
Player
Chelsea Vanhoutte
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Chelsea Vanhoutte
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chelsea Vanhoutte
Player
Emilie Elde
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Vanessa Ersoz Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Gyeong Seo Lee
Player
Vanessa Ersoz
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
87)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 7-5 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Zeel Desai
Player
Vanessa Ersoz
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Zeel Desai
Player
Vanessa Ersoz
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
78%
(
65 of
83)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
1
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Vanessa Ersoz
Player
Shachf Lieberman
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
41%
(
20 of
49)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
5 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Vanessa Ersoz
Player
Jagmeet Kaur Grewal
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Anastasia Safta
Player
Vanessa Ersoz
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Julia Stamatova
Player
Vanessa Ersoz
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
49%
(
28 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Evgeniya Burdina
Player
Vanessa Ersoz
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Madeleine Jessup
Player
Vanessa Ersoz
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H |
view more