Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chelsea Fontenel vs Carolina Bohrer Martins Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fontenel vs Martins analysis and find out who is favored!
Chelsea Fontenel vs Carolina Bohrer Martins Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fontenel has won 41.01% of points on his second serve, while Martins has won 34.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fontenel, in recent form, has won 56.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Martins has won 49.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.68% and 36.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fontenel has saved 36.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Martins has saved 52.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fontenel has won 43.48% of matches played (W/L 10/ 13), with Martins winning 25% (W/L 7/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fontenel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5). Martins has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 7/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Fontenel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.48% of matches (W/L 10/ 13), where as Martins has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 5/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fontenel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fontenel winning 2 and Martins winning 0. The last match between Fontenel and Martins was at the W15 Lubbock, 20-09-2022, Q3, Hard with Chelsea Fontenel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fontenel and Martins have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fontenel winning 0 times and Martins 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fontenel winning 0, and Martins 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fontenel has played against opponents with an average rank of 246.74 while Martins has played against players with an average rank of 268.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fontenel has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Martins has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fontenel has converted 36.21% of breakpoint opportunities, and Martins has converted 53.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fontenel 1 - 0 Martins
782
Rank
752
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
887
Rank
862
High
16
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
46% (26-30)
Career Total W/L
30% (14-32)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
13% (1-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Chelsea Fontenel | Carolina Bohrer Martins |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chelsea Fontenel | Carolina Bohrer Martins |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 13% (1/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 22% (4/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 42% (78/107) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 13% (1/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 8 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.66 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:9:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 206.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 53% (201/381) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (114/201) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (65/180) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 59% (20/34) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (163/374) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 13% (1/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (6/0) |
Chelsea Fontenel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Weronika Baszak
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
16 of
26)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Jokic
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
6-0 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Louise Kwong
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasmine Kabbaj
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
70%
(
64 of
92)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
1
Aces
4
13
Double Faults
4
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
48%
(
44 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Ellie Daniels
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(7) 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jade Otway
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexandra Vecic
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
81%
(
59 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Melany Solange Krywoj
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
51%
(
39 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Carolina Bohrer Martins Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Okalova
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
78%
(
92 of
118)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
97)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
17
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
52 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
97)
118
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(5) 6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juliana Rodriguez
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(3) 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Oana Gavrila
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
62)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
14
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jazmin Ortenzi
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
10
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Jorge
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Fontenel Vs Martins Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
