Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Charlotte Kempenaers-Pocz vs Elena Pridankina Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kempenaers-Pocz vs Pridankina analysis and find out who is favored!
Charlotte Kempenaers-Pocz vs Elena Pridankina Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kempenaers-Pocz has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Pridankina has won 51.88%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kempenaers-Pocz, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pridankina has won 58.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 41.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kempenaers-Pocz has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pridankina has saved 55.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kempenaers-Pocz has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Pridankina winning 75.32% (W/L 58/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kempenaers-Pocz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Pridankina has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 26/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 22/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Kempenaers-Pocz has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Pridankina has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.61% of matches (W/L 53/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kempenaers-Pocz has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Pridankina has played against players with an average rank of 237.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kempenaers-Pocz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pridankina has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kempenaers-Pocz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pridankina has converted 47.94% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kempenaers-Pocz 0 - 0 Pridankina
773
Rank
760
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
281
Rank
271
High
18
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
50% (12-12)
Career Total W/L
75% (102-34)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
81% (17-4)
$5,020
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kempenaers-Pocz VS Pridankina H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Charlotte Kempenaers-Pocz | Elena Pridankina |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 81% (17/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (35/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 59% (252/174) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 83% (5/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (12/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 44 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 33 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:39:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 306.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (872/1309) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (568/872) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (230/437) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (92/205) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (697/1463) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 81% (17/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 80% (16/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
Charlotte Kempenaers-Pocz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Salakthip Ounmuang
Player
Charlotte Kempenaers-Pocz
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
8
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hibah Shaikh
Player
Charlotte Kempenaers-Pocz
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charlotte Kempenaers-Pocz
Player
Akasha Urhobo
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 5-7 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Charlotte Kempenaers-Pocz
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
5
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charlotte Kempenaers-Pocz
Player
Ellen Perez
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charlotte Kempenaers-Pocz
Player
Nagi Hanatani
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
4-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Charlotte Kempenaers-Pocz
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
48%
(
38 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 7-5 10-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Elena Pridankina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Daria Zelinskaya
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Elena Pridankina
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
12
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
55%
(
27 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
39 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Alevtina Ibragimova
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Estelle Cascino
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dominika Salkova
Player
Elena Pridankina
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Mariam Bolkvadze
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
51%
(
25 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
55
Total Points Won
55
|
6-7(4) 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Celine Naef
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Ayla Aksu
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Elena Pridankina
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kempenaers-Pocz Vs Pridankina Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Elena Pridankina
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
