Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Charles Broom vs Patrick Zahraj Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Broom vs Zahraj analysis and find out who is favored!
Charles Broom vs Patrick Zahraj Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Broom has won 54% of points on his second serve, while Zahraj has won 47.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Broom, in recent form, has won 54.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zahraj has won 52.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.66% and 32.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Broom has saved 64.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zahraj has saved 61.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Broom has won 54.79% of matches played (W/L 40/ 33), with Zahraj winning 61.9% (W/L 39/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36). Zahraj has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 44/ 31), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.46% of matches (W/L 22/ 15), where as Zahraj has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.9% of matches (W/L 39/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Broom winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Broom winning 2 and Zahraj winning 2. The last match between Broom and Zahraj was at the Koblenz Challenger, 28-01-2024, Q1 round, I.hard with Charles Broom getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:1:25.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Broom and Zahraj have played a deciding set 0 times, with Broom winning 0 times and Zahraj 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Broom winning 2, and Zahraj 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Broom has played against opponents with an average rank of 207.62 while Zahraj has played against players with an average rank of 122.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Broom has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zahraj has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Broom has converted 39.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zahraj has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Broom 1 - 1 Zahraj
339
Rank
322
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
807
Rank
807
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
63% (196-116)
Career Total W/L
58% (81-59)
52% (11-10)
YTD W/L
58% (11-8)
$36,000
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Charles Broom | Patrick Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 20 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:1:25 | 1:1:25 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (49/79) | 60% (53/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (41/49) | 66% (35/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (14/30) | 57% (20/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (33/88) | 30% (24/79) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Charles Broom
Player
Patrick Zahraj
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
8
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Charles Broom | Patrick Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (11/10) | 58% (11/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (26/25) | 57% (25/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (247/251) | 53% (228/203) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) | 38% (3/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.6 | 0.52 |
| Aces Total | 147 | 110 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 76 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:39 | 1:41:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 138.76 | 183.84 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (983/1559) | 61% (750/1236) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (695/983) | 70% (528/750) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (308/576) | 47% (226/486) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (52/155) | 41% (52/126) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (649/1684) | 40% (503/1242) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (6/4) | 61% (11/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (11/21) | 58% (11/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 33% (9/3) |
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Charles Broom
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-0 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cash Hanzlik
Player
Charles Broom
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
36 of
42)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Charles Broom
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Lukas Pokorny
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Victor Lilov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Aidan Mchugh
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
107)
14
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Patrick Zahraj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Patrick Zahraj
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Arthur Nagel
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
5
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Patrick Zahraj
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
26
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
84%
(
58 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
30%
(
32 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Patrick Zahraj
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
3
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Ben Jones
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Patrick Zahraj
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Alberto Bronzetti
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Patrick Zahraj
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Amaury Raynel
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
David Perez Sanz
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Broom Vs Zahraj Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
