Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Charles Broom vs Daniel Rodrigues Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Broom vs Rodrigues analysis and find out who is favored!
Charles Broom vs Daniel Rodrigues Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Broom has won 54% of points on his second serve, while Rodrigues has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Broom, in recent form, has won 54.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rodrigues has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.66% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Broom has saved 64.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rodrigues has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Broom has won 54.79% of matches played (W/L 40/ 33), with Rodrigues winning 37.5% (W/L 6/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36). Rodrigues has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 20/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.46% of matches (W/L 22/ 15), where as Rodrigues has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 36.36% of matches (W/L 4/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Broom winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Broom winning 2 and Rodrigues winning 2. The last match between Broom and Rodrigues was at the Porto Challenger, 03-07-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Daniel Rodrigues getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:51:6.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Broom and Rodrigues have played a deciding set 0 times, with Broom winning 0 times and Rodrigues 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Broom winning 0, and Rodrigues 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Broom has played against opponents with an average rank of 207.62 while Rodrigues has played against players with an average rank of 236.69.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Broom has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rodrigues has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Broom has converted 39.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rodrigues has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Broom 1 - 1 Rodrigues
339
Rank
322
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
883
Rank
600
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
63% (196-116)
Career Total W/L
55% (96-78)
52% (11-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$36,000
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Charles Broom | Daniel Rodrigues |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 19 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:51:6 | 0:51:6 |
| 1st Serve % | 47% (28/60) | 58% (38/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (20/28) | 71% (27/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (13/32) | 61% (17/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (22/66) | 45% (27/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Daniel Rodrigues
Player
Charles Broom
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Charles Broom | Daniel Rodrigues |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (11/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (26/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (247/251) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.6 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 147 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:39 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 138.76 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (983/1559) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (695/983) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (308/576) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (52/155) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (649/1684) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (11/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Charles Broom
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-0 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cash Hanzlik
Player
Charles Broom
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
36 of
42)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Charles Broom
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Lukas Pokorny
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Victor Lilov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Aidan Mchugh
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
107)
14
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Rodrigues Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Adria Soriano Barrera
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
12
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
9
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
56%
(
68 of
122)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
10
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
7
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
45 of
53)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
37%
(
45 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
20 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Rodrigues
Player
Illia Stoliar
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Braden Shick
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Zheng
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
47%
(
30 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Rodrigues
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Popovic
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Broom Vs Rodrigues Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
