Chanikarn Silakul vs Puntila Namwong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Silakul vs Namwong analysis and find out who is favored!
Chanikarn Silakul vs Puntila Namwong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Silakul has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Namwong has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Silakul, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Namwong has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Silakul has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Namwong has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Silakul has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Namwong winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Silakul has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Namwong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 37), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 37).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Silakul winning 4 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Silakul winning 8 and Namwong winning 0. The last match between Silakul and Namwong was at the Hua Hin, 26-05-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Chanikarn Silakul getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Silakul and Namwong have played a deciding set 0 times, with Silakul winning 0 times and Namwong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Silakul winning 0, and Namwong 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Silakul has played against opponents with an average rank of while Namwong has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Silakul has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Namwong has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Silakul has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Namwong has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Silakul 4 - 0 Namwong
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
859
High
28
Age
Plays
4
Total0
4
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
33
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
33% (28-58)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-37)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Chanikarn Silakul | Puntila Namwong |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 4 | 0 |
Sets Won | 8 | 0 |
Games Won | 48 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-2 | |||||
6-4 6-1 | |||||
6-0 6-1 | |||||
6-1 6-0 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Chanikarn Silakul | Puntila Namwong |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Chanikarn Silakul Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Aldila Sutjiadi
Player
Chanikarn Silakul
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chanikarn Silakul
Player
Watsachol Sawasdee
79%
(
83 of
105)
1st Serve %
60%
(
72 of
120)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
45 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
57 of
120)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Watsachol Sawasdee
Player
Chanikarn Silakul
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
83%
(
40 of
48)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Ya Hsin Lee
Player
Chanikarn Silakul
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
83%
(
55 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
55%
(
33 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Chanikarn Silakul
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
24 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chanikarn Silakul
Player
Apichaya Runglerdkriangkrai
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
14%
(
1 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Bunyawi Thamchaiwat
Player
Chanikarn Silakul
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
82%
(
42 of
51)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 4-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Puntila Namwong Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Aiko Yoshitomi
Player
Puntila Namwong
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Patcharin Cheapchadej
Player
Puntila Namwong
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yu-Ting Hsieh
Player
Puntila Namwong
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mingyang Liu
Player
Puntila Namwong
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Shou Na Mu
Player
Puntila Namwong
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H |
view more