Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Billy Harris Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L W W L L
Form
L W W L L L W L L LHead To Head: Wong 1 - 1 Harris
They have played 5 sets in total, with Wong winning 2 and Harris winning 3. The last match between Wong and Harris was at the Cap Cana Challenger, 11-03-2025, First, Hard with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-3 6-7(4) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chak Lam Coleman Wong | 1 |
| Billy Harris | 1 |
Cap Cana Challenger(11-03-2025)
6
3
6
7
6
4
| Wong | Stats | Harris |
|---|---|---|
| 41% (7-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 49% (18-19) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 169 | Ranking | 102 |
| 128 | Highest Rank | 101 |
| 20 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 5 |
| 56% (139-110) | Career Total W/L | 61% (407-262) |
| $225,210 | Career Prize Money | $203,155 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kenin VS Sun PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
23 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 25 | Games Won | 26 |
| 16 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:44:51 | Average Match Time | 1:44:51 |
| 58% (84/144) | 1st Serve % | 68% (101/149) |
| 76% (64/84) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (78/101) |
| 58% (35/60) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (26/48) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (4/10) |
| 30% (45/149) | Return Points Win % | 31% (45/144) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ben Shelton
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Daniel Altmaier
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Billy Harris Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Billy Harris
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Billy Harris
49%
(
49 of
99)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
102)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
52%
(
26 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Billy Harris
52%
(
47 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
73%
(
32 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Aleksandar Vukic
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Billy Harris
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
5
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Billy Harris
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Billy Harris
69%
(
65 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Hugo Gaston
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Mikael Ymer
60%
(
75 of
125)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
50 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
51 of
121)
126
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (139/110) | Win/Loss | 61% (407/262) |
| 54% (311/269) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (911/654) |
| 51% (2855/2734) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7968/7007) |
| 59% (115/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (176/106) |
| 50% (18/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (153/101) |
| 43% (6/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (49/39) |
| 0% (0/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 64% (29/16) |
| 0.48 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1315 | Aces Total | 2433 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 502 | Total Double Faults | 1820 |
| 1:30:16 | Average Match Time | 1:25:2 |
| 379.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 409.54 |
| 60% (9202/15310) | 1st Serve % | 61% (23150/37974) |
| 71% (6508/9202) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16246/23150) |
| 48% (2957/6108) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7253/14823) |
| 40% (583/1449) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1583/3656) |
| 39% (5978/15446) | Return Points Win % | 40% (15184/38222) |
| 33% (2/4) | Slam W/L | 56% (9/7) |
| 44% (4/5) | Masters W/L | 40% (4/6) |
| 63% (5/3) | Cups W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 38% (3/5) | Main Tour W/L | 52% (15/14) |
| 55% (53/44) | Challenger W/L | 56% (96/74) |
| 60% (72/49) | Futures W/L | 64% (282/159) |
| 55% (134/244) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (404/663) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 55% (45/82) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (106/212) |
| 57% (46/81) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (129/228) |
| 88% (129/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (396/341) |
| 12% (129/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (396/55) |
| 21% (120/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (273/66) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
