Prediction of Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Benjamin Hassan Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
57% (134-102)
Career Total W/L
59% (309-211)
50% (2-2)
YTD W/L
40% (2-3)
$164,810
Career Prize Money
$262,000
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Benjamin Hassan
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| stats | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Benjamin Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 5 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:22 | 1:39:22 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (56/76) | 58% (52/90) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (45/56) | 75% (39/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (12/20) | 58% (22/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (29/90) | 25% (19/76) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Benjamin Hassan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wong 1 - 0 Hassan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wong has won 48.9% of points on their second serve, while Hassan has won 50.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wong, in recent form, has won 47.68% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hassan has won 48.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.6% and 32.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wong has saved 64.06% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hassan has saved 62.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wong has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 42/ 36), with Hassan winning 48.72% (W/L 38/ 40) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 111/ 74), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Hassan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 188/ 115), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.93% of matches (W/L 33/ 26), where as Hassan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 25/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wong winning 1 times and Hassan being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wong winning 2 and Hassan winning 0. The last match between Wong and Hassan was at the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger, 14-01-2025, First, Hard with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 7-6(2) 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:22.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wong and Hassan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wong winning 0 times and Hassan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Wong winning 2, and Hassan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 247.05 while Hassan has played against players with an average rank of 196.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wong has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hassan has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wong has converted 41.07% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hassan has converted 38.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Benjamin Hassan
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Dmitry Popko
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
64 of
110)
10
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
0
88%
(
50 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
26%
(
23 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
36 of
110)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
7-5 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
4
Aces
17
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
24 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Masamichi Imamura
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
64)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Lennon Roark Jones
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Benjamin Hassan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Benjamin Hassan
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Benjamin Hassan
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
53 of
63)
74%
(
29 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
33%
(
33 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
29 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Nicolas Mejia
51%
(
53 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
7
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
38 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Benjamin Hassan
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Jelle Sels
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
8
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Benjamin Hassan
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve %
47%
(
8 of
17)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
24
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Omar Jasika
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
38 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Jakub Paul
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
75%
(
66 of
88)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
James McCabe
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
68%
(
81 of
119)
6
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
54 of
81)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
33 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
48 of
119)
119
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(1) 6-7(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Benjamin Hassan
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Wong vs Hassan?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Wong Vs Hassan is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Benjamin Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (2/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 42% (5/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (44/53) | 49% (63/65) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.85 | 0.51 |
| Aces Total | 40 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 7 | 24 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:48 | 1:44:26 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 145.5 | 228.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (202/296) | 58% (229/396) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (155/202) | 79% (181/229) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (43/94) | 47% (79/167) |
| BPs Won% Total | 15% (2/13) | 29% (10/35) |
| Return Pts W% | 28% (84/297) | 34% (137/400) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (1/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 40% (2/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
