Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Beibit Zhukayev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Lam Coleman Wong vs B. Zhukayev

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

145

C. Rank

282

128

Best Rank

171

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$347.3K

Plays

Right-Handed

Beibit Zhukayev

KAZ

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

145

C. Rank

282

128

Best Rank

171

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$347.3K

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Wong 1 - 0 Zhukayev

They have played 2 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2 and Beibit Zhukayev winning 0. The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Beibit Zhukayev was at the Shanghai Challenger, 06-09-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Wong	1
Zhukayev	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(QF) Shanghai Challenger(09-06-24)

Stats

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Beibit Zhukayev

C. L. C. Wong vs B. Zhukayev H2H Profile

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	B. Zhukayev
$538,970	Career Prize Money	$347,285
55.78% (164-130)	Career Total W/L	51.69% (199-186)
1	Hard	0
2	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
45.45% (5-6)	YTD Win/Loss	25.00% (1-3)

C. L. C. Wong vs B. Zhukayev Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 47.37% of points on their second serve, while Beibit Zhukayev has won 45.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chak Lam Coleman Wong, in recent form, has won 44.20% of their opponent's second serve points, while Beibit Zhukayev has won 43.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.72% and 19.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 51.59% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Beibit Zhukayev has saved 55.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 51.52% of matches played (W/L 34/32), with Beibit Zhukayev winning 47.37% (W/L 27/30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8). Beibit Zhukayev has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 59% (W/L 12/9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 31/47).
Player level: In the last year, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.00% of matches (W/L 22/18), where as Beibit Zhukayev has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.00% of matches (W/L 18/22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 1 times and Beibit Zhukayev being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2 and Beibit Zhukayev winning 0.
The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Beibit Zhukayev was at the Shanghai Challenger, 06-09-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:17.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 208.7 while Beibit Zhukayev has played against players with an average rank of 267.19.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Beibit Zhukayev has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 33.54% of breakpoint opportunities, and Beibit Zhukayev has converted 28.46% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Beibit Zhukayev Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. L. C. Wong vs B. Zhukayev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	B. Zhukayev
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	9
11	Aces (Total)	12
2	Total Double Faults	4
1:34:17	Average Match Time	1:34:17
75% (47/63)	1st Serve %	70% (50/71)
85% (40/47)	1st Serve Win %	78% (39/50)
69% (11/16)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (9/21)
13% (1/8)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/1)
32% (23/71)	Return Points Win %	19% (12/63)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

B. Zhukayev Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Lyon Challenger - 10-11-2025
R1 Jan-Lennard StruffJ. Struff	L	6-7(5) 7-6(1) 6-4	Stats
Q3 George LoffhagenG. Loffhagen	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
Q1 Edas ButvilasE. Butvilas	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Bratislava 2 Challenger - 27-10-2025
Q3 Vitaliy SachkoV. Sachko	L	6-4 6-7(1) 6-4	Stats
Q1 Tomas LanikT. Lanik	W	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong vs B. Zhukayev Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	B. Zhukayev
55.78% (164/130)	YTD Win/Loss	51.69% (199/186)
54.07% (372/316)	Sets Win/Loss	51.51% (461/434)
51.16% (3419/3264)	Games Win/Loss	50.41% (4478/4406)
58.90% (129/90)	Hard Win/Loss	55.34% (114/92)
46.51% (20/23)	Clay Win/Loss	39.74% (31/47)
50.00% (9/9)	Indoor Hard W/L	52.50% (42/38)
42.86% (6/8)	Grass Win/Loss	57.14% (12/9)
0.52	Aces Per Game	0.75
1687	Aces Total	3265
0.18	Double Faults Per Game	0.32
603	Total Double Faults	1398
1:31:40	Average Match Time	1:32:2
366.8	Average Opponent Rank	400.74
60% (11331/18739)	1st Serve %	59% (14931/25375)
71% (8054/11331)	1st Serve Win %	76% (11321/14931)
49% (3631/7408)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (5073/10444)
41% (703/1718)	Break Points Won % (Total)	39% (724/1835)
38% (7230/18830)	Return Points Win %	35% (8488/24430)
53.33% (8/7)	Slam W/L	53.33% (8/7)
46.67% (7/8)	Masters W/L	60.00% (6/4)
62.50% (5/3)	Cups W/L	100.00% (2/0)
27.27% (3/8)	Main Tour W/L	45.83% (11/13)
55.65% (69/55)	Challenger W/L	48.02% (85/92)
59.50% (72/49)	Futures W/L	55.41% (87/70)
55% (157/286)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	52% (195/378)
83% (5/6)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	40% (2/5)
55% (56/102)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (95/183)
54% (51/94)	Deciding Set Win %	48% (58/121)
87% (157/136)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (203/167)
13% (157/21)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (203/36)
20% (137/27)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (182/31)