Prediction of Cesar Ramirez vs Marcelo Arevalo Head-to-Head, At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
Head-To-Head
2 - 3
56% (184-143)
Career Total W/L
58% (378-277)
0% (0-0)
Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$147,030
0
YTD Titles
0
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 4-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Marcelo Arevalo
Player
Cesar Ramirez
50%
(
52 of
104)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
7
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
| 6-3 ret. | |||||
| 7-5 6-4 | |||||
| 6-1 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
| stats | Cesar Ramirez | Marcelo Arevalo |
|---|---|---|
| H2H Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 5 |
| Games Won | 52 | 52 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 7 |
| Total Double Faults | 7 | 9 |
| Average Match Time | 0:28:57 | 0:28:57 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (59/101) | 50% (52/104) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (42/59) | 63% (33/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (16/42) | 56% (29/52) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 33% (5/15) |
| Return Points Win % | 40% (42/104) | 43% (43/101) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cesar Ramirez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Matt Kuhar
Player
Cesar Ramirez
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
51 of
68)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Cesar Ramirez
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
14
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jim Hendrikx
Player
Cesar Ramirez
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
72%
(
66 of
92)
8
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
54 of
66)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Cesar Ramirez
Player
Ernesto Ruy Sanchez Pavon
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Cesar Ramirez
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Cesar Ramirez
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mwendwa Mbithi
Player
Cesar Ramirez
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
48%
(
19 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
34
Total Points Won
39
|
2-6 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mateo Gomez
Player
Cesar Ramirez
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
48%
(
10 of
21)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
55%
(
21 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
28
Total Points Won
40
|
0-6 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mateo Gomez
Player
Cesar Ramirez
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
67 of
97)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Marcelo Arevalo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 5 | 2-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 4-6 6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Marcelo Arevalo
Player
Wojciech Marek
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Marcelo Arevalo
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cesar Ramirez | Marcelo Arevalo |
|---|---|---|
| Win/Loss | 56% (184/143) | 58% (378/277) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (417/299) | 57% (877/668) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (3522/2945) | 53% (7775/6862) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (125/89) | 58% (199/144) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (54/48) | 61% (171/110) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 29% (6/15) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (2/8) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.07 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 208 | 1650 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 | 0.16 |
| Total Double Faults | 202 | 1174 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 547.02 | 550.08 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (2957/4412) | 63% (14909/23818) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1972/2957) | 71% (10538/14909) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (676/1455) | 50% (4473/8909) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (192/406) | 42% (943/2246) |
| Return Points Win % | 39% (1750/4471) | 39% (9268/24048) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (5/12) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Cups W/L | 47% (7/8) | 67% (31/15) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (2/6) | 26% (6/17) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 34% (24/47) | 51% (140/135) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (151/82) | 67% (195/95) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (177/298) | 57% (351/615) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (4/12) | 61% (20/33) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (32/83) | 47% (99/210) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 39% (26/66) | 50% (102/203) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (195/172) | 86% (372/319) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (195/20) | 14% (372/52) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (130/13) | 20% (283/58) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
