Cengiz AKSU vs Matias Ponce De Leon Gomila Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our AKSU vs Gomila analysis and find out who is favored!
Cengiz AKSU vs Matias Ponce De Leon Gomila Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), AKSU has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Gomila has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show AKSU, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gomila has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: AKSU has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gomila has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year AKSU has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Gomila winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, AKSU has played against opponents with an average rank of while Gomila has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, AKSU has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gomila has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, AKSU has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gomila has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: AKSU 0 - 0 Gomila
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Cengiz AKSU Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Cengiz Aksu
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Hien Pham
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
56
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Louis Van Herck
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Cengiz Aksu
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maxime Chazal
Player
Cengiz Aksu
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Cengiz Aksu
80%
(
74 of
92)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Peter Heller
Player
Cengiz Aksu
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Matias Ponce De Leon Gomila Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Louroi Martinez
Player
Matias Ponce De Leon Gomila
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alen Moritz Hodzic
Player
Matias Ponce De Leon Gomila
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 2-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jeroen Vanneste
Player
Matias Ponce De Leon Gomila
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(4) 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Cayetano March
Player
Matias Ponce De Leon Gomila
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
48
Total Points Won
48
|
1-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H |
view more