Cem Ilkel vs Tomas Vaise Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Vaise analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Tomas Vaise Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 47.74% of points on his second serve, while Vaise has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 51.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vaise has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.31% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 53.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vaise has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 39.58% of matches played (W/L 19/ 29), with Vaise winning 50% (W/L 14/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 254/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Vaise has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 4/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20), where as Vaise has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 14/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Vaise winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Vaise was at the Vilnus Challenger, 16-10-2022, Q1 round, I.hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:41.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Vaise have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Vaise 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 0, and Vaise 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 236.83 while Vaise has played against players with an average rank of 29.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vaise has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 44.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vaise has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Vaise
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
415
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (400-309)
Career Total W/L
38% (36-59)
44% (8-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Cem Ilkel | Tomas Vaise |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:18:41 | 1:18:41 |
1st Serve % | 44% (20/45) | 45% (30/66) |
1st Serve Win% | 90% (18/20) | 57% (17/30) |
2nd Serve Win% | 52% (13/25) | 36% (13/36) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 55% (36/66) | 31% (14/45) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tomas Vaise
44%
(
20 of
45)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
66)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Cem Ilkel | Tomas Vaise |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 44% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 43% (17/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (165/195) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.54 | 0 |
Aces Total | 94 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
DFs Total | 42 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:28:14 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 162.39 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (616/1073) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (442/616) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (210/457) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (32/74) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (378/1044) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more
Tomas Vaise Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Diogo Marques
Player
Tomas Vaise
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Jeiden Saidizand
Player
Tomas Vaise
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
18 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
93)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(2) 6-4 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 4-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Tomas Vaise
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Vojtech Vlkovsky
Player
Tomas Vaise
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
44%
(
32 of
72)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Tomas Vaise
Player
Breno Rossetto Urvaneja
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more