Cem Ilkel vs Thando Longwe-Smit Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L W W L
Form
L W W W L W W W W LH2H: Ilkel 1 - 0 Longwe-Smit
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Longwe-Smit winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Longwe-Smit was at the M15 Pretoria, 27-02-2025, Second, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cem Ilkel | 1 |
| Thando Longwe-Smit | 0 |
M15 Pretoria(27-02-2025)
6
3
6
2
| Ilkel | Stats | Longwe-Smit |
|---|---|---|
| 79% (26-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (10-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 574 | Ranking | N/A |
| 144 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 29 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (434-333) | Career Total W/L | 52% (23-21) |
| $225,530 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cirstea VS Baptiste PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ilkel VS Longwe-Smit H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Cem Ilkel
Player
Thando Longwe-Smit
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Ilkel VS Longwe-Smit H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:11:56 | Average Match Time | 1:11:56 |
| 70% (30/43) | 1st Serve % | 57% (26/46) |
| 90% (27/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (14/26) |
| 69% (9/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (11/20) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (21/46) | Return Points Win % | 16% (7/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matteo Lavizzari
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
47 of
59)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Alkaya
Player
Cem Ilkel
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Haupt
31%
(
4 of
13)
1st Serve %
73%
(
11 of
15)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
22
Total Points Won
6
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Cem Ilkel
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tuncay Duran
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
67 of
87)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matyas Fuele
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Thando Longwe-Smit Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Leonardo Rossi
Player
Thando Longwe-Smit
59%
(
70 of
118)
1st Serve %
69%
(
83 of
121)
7
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
0
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
55 of
83)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
40 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
45 of
121)
123
Total Points Won
116
|
6-4 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thando Longwe-Smit
Player
Marcello Serafini
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
47%
(
25 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thando Longwe-Smit
Player
Tuncay Duran
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve %
73%
(
11 of
15)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
11 of
11)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
41%
(
11 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
17
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 3-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Thando Longwe-Smit
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-2 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (434/333) | Win/Loss | 52% (23/21) |
| 55% (970/804) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (51/46) |
| 52% (8701/8179) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (475/445) |
| 62% (284/177) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (23/21) |
| 45% (57/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (92/76) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 10% (1/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 2819 | Aces Total | 67 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1375 | Total Double Faults | 77 |
| 1:14:51 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 532.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 222.11 |
| 58% (23808/40754) | 1st Serve % | 55% (786/1430) |
| 70% (16743/23808) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (538/786) |
| 51% (8644/16946) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (306/644) |
| 40% (1608/3978) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (49/119) |
| 39% (16047/41231) | Return Points Win % | 37% (525/1404) |
| 32% (7/15) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 18% (5/23) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (175/159) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (238/120) | Futures W/L | 52% (23/21) |
| 56% (422/748) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (23/44) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (146/272) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
| 56% (129/231) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (4/9) |
| 85% (421/359) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (25/22) |
| 14% (421/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (25/3) |
| 21% (345/73) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (19/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
