Cem Ilkel vs Sanjar Fayziev Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Fayziev analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Sanjar Fayziev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 47.74% of points on his second serve, while Fayziev has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 51.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fayziev has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.31% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 53.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fayziev has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 39.58% of matches played (W/L 19/ 29), with Fayziev winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 254/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Fayziev has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 46/ 35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20), where as Fayziev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 4/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ilkel winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 1 and Fayziev winning 4. The last match between Ilkel and Fayziev was at the Davis Cup, Group I, PO, UZB-TUR 2-3, 04-03-2022, Rubber 1, I.hard with Sanjar Fayziev getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:54:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Fayziev have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Fayziev 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 1, and Fayziev 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 236.83 while Fayziev has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fayziev has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 44.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fayziev has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilkel 0 - 2 Fayziev
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
415
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
899
Rank
253
High
29
Age
R
Plays
7
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
7
Minor
Form
56% (400-309)
Career Total W/L
56% (249-197)
44% (8-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Cem Ilkel | Sanjar Fayziev |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
Games Won | 24 | 31 |
Aces (Total) | 11 | 5 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 0:54:0 | 0:54:0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (49/84) | 59% (43/73) |
1st Serve Win% | 76% (37/49) | 79% (34/43) |
2nd Serve Win% | 49% (17/35) | 63% (19/30) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 15% (2/13) |
Return Points W% | 27% (20/73) | 36% (30/84) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-7(1) 6-4 | |||||
w/o | |||||
7-6(7) 6-4 |
Sanjar Fayziev
Player
Cem Ilkel
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
5
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
20 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Cem Ilkel | Sanjar Fayziev |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 44% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 43% (17/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (165/195) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.54 | 0 |
Aces Total | 94 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
DFs Total | 42 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:28:14 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 162.39 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (616/1073) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (442/616) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (210/457) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (32/74) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (378/1044) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more
Sanjar Fayziev Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Alexander Zgirovsky
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
52 of
100)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
48 of
95)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Adit Sinha
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 6-0 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-7(5) 7-5 10-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Tuncay Duran
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 3-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
13 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sanjar Fayziev
Player
Gabor Mathe
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more