MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Cem Ilkel [578th] vs Pepijn Bastiaansen [] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-To-Head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Bastiaansen

They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Bastiaansen winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Bastiaansen was at the M15 Pretoria, 02-03-2025, Final, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Cem Ilkel 1
Pepijn Bastiaansen 0
Ilkel vs Bastiaansen H2H Profile
Ilkel Stats Bastiaansen
79% (26-7) YTD Win/Loss 75% (18-6)
1 Head-to-Head 0
578 Ranking N/A
144 Highest Rank
29 Age 19
R Plays -
7 Titles 0
57% (434-333) Career Total W/L 54% (35-30)
$225,530 Career Prize Money $0
2 YTD Titles 0
1 Hard H2H 0
0 Clay H2H 0
0 Indoor H2H 0
0 Grass H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Ilkel VS Bastiaansen H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-3 6-4
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
64% ( 43 of 67)
1st Serve %
66% ( 35 of 53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67% ( 29 of 43)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 22 of 35)
58% ( 14 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
36% ( 24 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 23 of 53)
66
Total Points Won
54

Ilkel VS Bastiaansen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Ilkel Vs Bastiaansen H2H Stats
Cem Ilkel Ilkel Stats Pepijn Bastiaansen Bastiaansen
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 0
12 Games Won 7
4 Aces (Total) 3
1 Total Double Faults 1
1:21:1 Average Match Time 1:21:1
64% (43/67) 1st Serve % 66% (35/53)
67% (29/43) 1st Serve Win % 63% (22/35)
58% (14/24) 2nd Serve Win % 44% (8/18)
60% (3/5) Break Points Won % (Total) 20% (1/5)
43% (23/53) Return Points Win % 36% (24/67)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Cem Ilkel vs Pepijn Bastiaansen Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Bastiaansen

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 46.28% of points on their second serve, while Bastiaansen has won 42.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 40.37% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bastiaansen has won 45.19%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.96% and 27.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 51.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bastiaansen has saved 44.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 58.62% of matches played (W/L 34/ 24), with Bastiaansen winning 64.52% (W/L 20/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 284/ 177), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Bastiaansen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 21/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
  • Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 28/ 12), where as Bastiaansen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.52% of matches (W/L 20/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times and Bastiaansen being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Bastiaansen winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Bastiaansen was at the M15 Pretoria, 02-03-2025, Final, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:1.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Bastiaansen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Bastiaansen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 0, and Bastiaansen 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 432.71 while Bastiaansen has played against players with an average rank of 202.48.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bastiaansen has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 36.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bastiaansen has converted 27.94% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)

Cem Ilkel vs Pepijn Bastiaansen Best Odds For The Match

Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
QF
cross
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
61% ( 47 of 77)
1st Serve %
76% ( 62 of 82)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72% ( 34 of 47)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 39 of 62)
63% ( 19 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 12 of 20)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
31% ( 24 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 31 of 82)
84
Total Points Won
75
L
6-1 4-6 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matteo Lavizzari
58% ( 57 of 98)
1st Serve %
60% ( 59 of 99)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
72% ( 41 of 57)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 47 of 59)
56% ( 23 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 17 of 40)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
35% ( 34 of 98)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 35 of 99)
99
Total Points Won
98
W
6-4 2-6 7-6(2) H2H
R1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
61% ( 62 of 101)
1st Serve %
62% ( 68 of 110)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74% ( 46 of 62)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 47 of 68)
64% ( 25 of 39)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 22 of 42)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
30% ( 30 of 101)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 41 of 110)
112
Total Points Won
99
W
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Mert Alkaya
Player
Cem Ilkel
57% ( 35 of 61)
1st Serve %
53% ( 31 of 58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69% ( 24 of 35)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 20 of 31)
50% ( 13 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 10 of 27)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
39% ( 24 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 28 of 58)
65
Total Points Won
54
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Haupt
31% ( 4 of 13)
1st Serve %
73% ( 11 of 15)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100% ( 4 of 4)
1st Serve Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
89% ( 8 of 9)
2nd Serve Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
8% ( 1 of 13)
Rtn Points Won
67% ( 10 of 15)
22
Total Points Won
6
W
5-1 ret. H2H
QF
cross
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Cem Ilkel
70% ( 42 of 60)
1st Serve %
56% ( 46 of 82)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76% ( 32 of 42)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 30 of 46)
44% ( 8 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 16 of 36)
23% ( 3 of 13)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
33% ( 20 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 36 of 82)
76
Total Points Won
66
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tuncay Duran
68% ( 50 of 74)
1st Serve %
77% ( 67 of 87)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
62% ( 31 of 50)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 39 of 67)
75% ( 18 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 11 of 20)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
34% ( 25 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 37 of 87)
86
Total Points Won
75
W
3-6 6-2 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
65% ( 48 of 74)
1st Serve %
62% ( 53 of 86)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73% ( 35 of 48)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 34 of 53)
54% ( 14 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 13 of 33)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
34% ( 25 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 39 of 86)
88
Total Points Won
72
W
6-2 4-6 6-2 H2H
F
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
64% ( 43 of 67)
1st Serve %
66% ( 35 of 53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67% ( 29 of 43)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 22 of 35)
58% ( 14 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
36% ( 24 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 23 of 53)
66
Total Points Won
54
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matyas Fuele
57% ( 27 of 47)
1st Serve %
49% ( 23 of 47)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81% ( 22 of 27)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 11 of 23)
55% ( 11 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
30% ( 14 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 26 of 47)
59
Total Points Won
35
W
6-0 6-4 H2H

Pepijn Bastiaansen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
QF
L
7-6(4) 6-0 H2H
Q2
W
6-3 6-2 H2H
Q1
W
6-0 6-2 H2H
QF
L
6-2 3-6 10-5 H2H
Q2
W
6-4 4-6 10-2 H2H
Q1
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
F
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
64% ( 43 of 67)
1st Serve %
66% ( 35 of 53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67% ( 29 of 43)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 22 of 35)
58% ( 14 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
36% ( 24 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 23 of 53)
66
Total Points Won
54
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Pepijn Bastiaansen
Player
Izan Almazan Valiente
57% ( 47 of 82)
1st Serve %
69% ( 58 of 84)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
72% ( 34 of 47)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 39 of 58)
60% ( 21 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 14 of 26)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
33% ( 27 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 31 of 84)
86
Total Points Won
80
W
3-6 6-4 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Pepijn Bastiaansen
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
56% ( 29 of 52)
1st Serve %
70% ( 31 of 44)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
76% ( 22 of 29)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 16 of 31)
74% ( 17 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
62% ( 8 of 13)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
25% ( 13 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 20 of 44)
59
Total Points Won
37
W
6-3 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Pepijn Bastiaansen
Player
Alexander Donski
50% ( 27 of 54)
1st Serve %
59% ( 44 of 75)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
74% ( 20 of 27)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 29 of 44)
63% ( 17 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 13 of 31)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
31% ( 17 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 33 of 75)
70
Total Points Won
59
W
1-6 6-2 4-1 ret. H2H

Where To Watch Ilkel vs Bastiaansen?

When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Ilkel Vs Bastiaansen is now available here.

banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Ilkel & Bastiaansen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Cem Ilkel Ilkel Stats Pepijn Bastiaansen Bastiaansen
57% (434/333) Win/Loss 54% (35/30)
55% (970/804) Sets Win/Loss 52% (77/70)
52% (8701/8179) Games Win/Loss 51% (707/669)
0.34 Aces Per Game 0.08
2819 Aces Total 54
0.17 Double Faults Per Game 0.08
1375 Total Double Faults 54
1:14:51 Average Match Time 1st Match
531.78 Average Opponent Rank 189.42
58% (23808/40754) 1st Serve % 59% (790/1332)
70% (16743/23808) 1st Serve Win % 62% (492/790)
51% (8644/16946) 2nd Serve Win % 49% (265/542)
40% (1608/3978) Break Points Won % (Total) 40% (52/130)
39% (16047/41231) Return Points Win % 40% (528/1325)
56% (422/748) Best of 3 Sets Win % 53% (34/64)
40% (4/10) Best of 5 Sets Win % 100% (1/1)
54% (146/272) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 71% (5/7)
56% (129/231) Deciding Set Win % 56% (9/16)
85% (421/359) 1st Set Won, Won Match 85% (34/29)
14% (421/60) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 15% (34/5)
21% (345/73) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 19% (31/6)

Other Predictions

San Luis Potosi Challenger

flag
20 Apr
flag
03:30
Prediction

Gwangju Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction

Gwangju Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction

Gwangju Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction

Gwangju Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction
  • Loading news...