Cem Ilkel vs Michiel De Krom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Krom analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Michiel De Krom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 47.92% of points on his second serve, while Krom has won 51.31%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 52.8% of his opponent's second serve points, while Krom has won 54.01%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.2% and 35.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Krom has saved 55.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 40% of matches played (W/L 18/ 27), with Krom winning 62.12% (W/L 41/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 253/ 160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Krom has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 58/ 42), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20), where as Krom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.12% of matches (W/L 41/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Krom winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Krom was at the Egypt F33 (Sharm El Sheikh), 08-11-2017, First, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Krom have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Krom 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 0, and Krom 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 253.76 while Krom has played against players with an average rank of 145.45.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Krom has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 43.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Krom has converted 48.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Krom
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
390
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
778
Rank
689
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (399-307)
Career Total W/L
56% (169-131)
47% (7-8)
YTD W/L
67% (16-8)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Cem Ilkel | Michiel De Krom |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:44:0 | 1:44:0 |
1st Serve % | 65% (56/86) | 67% (59/88) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (40/56) | 59% (35/59) |
2nd Serve Win% | 43% (13/30) | 41% (12/29) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 11% (1/9) |
Return Points W% | 47% (41/88) | 38% (33/86) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-3 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Michiel De Krom
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Cem Ilkel | Michiel De Krom |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 47% (7/8) | 67% (16/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 42% (14/19) | 64% (34/19) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (136/160) | 59% (291/206) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 65% (13/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.53 | 0.1 |
Aces Total | 76 | 24 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.15 |
DFs Total | 29 | 37 |
Avg Match Time | 1:25:17 | 1:17:50 |
Avg Opp Rank | 194.87 | 187.33 |
1st Serve % | 58% (510/882) | 70% (790/1121) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (363/510) | 61% (482/790) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (170/372) | 53% (174/331) |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (27/62) | 52% (67/130) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (318/859) | 44% (495/1113) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (16/8) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (6/14) | 67% (16/24) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 20% (1/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 60% (3/5) |
1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 88% (17/15) |
1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 12% (17/2) |
1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 14% (7/1) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve %
60%
(
12 of
20)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
27
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Michiel De Krom Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Michiel De Krom
Player
Nick Hardt
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michiel De Krom
Player
Alex Marti Pujolras
76%
(
68 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Michiel De Krom
Player
Valentin Gonzalez-Galino
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
20 of
39)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Michiel De Krom
67%
(
66 of
98)
1st Serve %
83%
(
96 of
116)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
52 of
96)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
116)
114
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Michiel De Krom
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
QF | 4-6 6-1 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Sergey Fomin
Player
Michiel De Krom
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more