Cem Ilkel vs Mauricio Echazu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Echazu analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Mauricio Echazu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 47.92% of points on his second serve, while Echazu has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 52.8% of his opponent's second serve points, while Echazu has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.2% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Echazu has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 40% of matches played (W/L 18/ 27), with Echazu winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 253/ 160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Echazu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 288/ 222), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20), where as Echazu has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Echazu winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Echazu was at the Turkey F10 (Antalya), 15-03-2017, First, Clay with Cem Ilkel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Echazu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Echazu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 0, and Echazu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 253.76 while Echazu has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Echazu has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 43.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Echazu has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Echazu
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
390
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
379
High
35
Age
Plays
6
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
Form
57% (399-307)
Career Total W/L
56% (438-344)
47% (7-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Cem Ilkel | Mauricio Echazu |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:24:0 | 1:24:0 |
1st Serve % | 50% (22/44) | 66% (37/56) |
1st Serve Win% | 86% (19/22) | 57% (21/37) |
2nd Serve Win% | 45% (10/22) | 32% (6/19) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 50% (1/2) |
Return Points W% | 52% (29/56) | 34% (15/44) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-4 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Mauricio Echazu
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Cem Ilkel | Mauricio Echazu |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 42% (14/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (136/160) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.53 | 0 |
Aces Total | 76 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
DFs Total | 29 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:25:17 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 194.87 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (510/882) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (363/510) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (170/372) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (27/62) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (318/859) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (6/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve %
60%
(
12 of
20)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
27
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Mauricio Echazu Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Mauricio Echazu
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Wilson Leite
Player
Mauricio Echazu
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
81%
(
48 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mwendwa Mbithi
Player
Mauricio Echazu
56%
(
59 of
106)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mauricio Echazu
Player
Franco Feitt
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Manuel Sanchez
Player
Mauricio Echazu
64%
(
68 of
106)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
108)
10
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
33 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
113
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mauricio Echazu
Player
Alonso Alejandro Delgado
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Joshua Ortlip
Player
Mauricio Echazu
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mauricio Echazu
Player
Alfredo Casso
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
50
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maximiliano Estevez
Player
Mauricio Echazu
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mauricio Echazu
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more